I don’t think that was the point of the comment you replied to.

The point is that even if it was a real video, it’s not illegal. Just like a video of 9/11 is not a terrorist attack nor is it illegal, it’s just a video of one.

Google was legitimately a force for good at one point. It’s hard to believe 2 decades later.

I don’t either but I often use the bathroom after coming back home from outside, and the phone is still in my pocket at least then.

You take it out of your pants pocket before entering the bathroom?

Lol you are so argumentative that this is how you respond to someone agreeing with you? Forcibly putting me into the “opposing camp” against my will. All right then, live your delusion while we fight AI without you.

That’s the communication problem in these conversations. Whether it’s a useful tool and whether it’s an ethical tool are two different questions. People come in and attack the developers for generating slop, and they respond that they are experienced developers who can use the tool properly to increase the security of the code or whatever. And the conversation here is about that.

And then someone like you comes in talking about ethics, which is what we should be talking about, but we are talking past each other.

The truth is most commenters are not technically skilled to evaluate or critique their decisions.

I don’t need to be skilled to evaluate or critique their decisions.

You are both correct. But the former is about the engineering, the latter is about ethics. You do need to technically skilled to evaluate whether AI is a useful tool for Graphene. You don’t need to in order to critique it on ethical grounds. These are completely different topics that have nothing to do with each other.

Ok, so shareholders shouldn’t be liable after all is what you are saying, only people having a say.

Can you link these reports? Not that I don’t believe it, but I see many comments claiming this and never including any evidence.

“AI makes it easier to be lazy and produce buggy software faster” is your claim, which I agree with. But I have to note that “thus AI can’t be used to produce high quality software” is not something that follows from that.

Because you buy it. It being a limited license of course, not a game.

It’s a fair question. I think out of the two proposed rules: enforce no AI generated code, and enforce human reviews, enforcing human reviews is actually more feasible, and in fact most companies already do that. Pull requests need human reviewers to approve them.

It’s harder to enforce no AI generated code. A developer can always, at the very least, Google a problem they are having on their phone and retype the code from the AI answer into their work computer.

How do you enforce code is not AI generated? I don’t see how one is more easily enforceable than the other.

I hope you mean when he bought it, not when he announced it. He announces a lot of things all the time which never happen.

Broken ports, replace hard drive, replace memory, no software locks so custom software can keep it alive, replace battery (on a Switch for example).

Lots of thing right to repair could do for consoles.

The filaments themselves may be food safe but that doesn’t matter. The resulting object is not food safe not because of the material but because of the manufacturing process. Printing layer by layer leaves miniscule voids and holes in-between layers where bacteria can thrive and which are impossible to clean.

Your print is safe to eat out of the first time, but is never food safe again as it can never be cleaned from bacteria in all the thin holes.

I can, I’m responding to “not sure why I haven’t blocked .ml”. One reason is that there are normal people there. I know the best course of action for me personally is to move. But I don’t know where to and don’t use Lemmy so much to dedicate time to researching it. Knowing my luck I’d probably end up on an even more controversial one.

That doesn’t seem to be the case, what are you basing this on?

Some of us just registered on “the default most vanilla instance ran by the Lemmy developers” without knowing the politics

If you want to align virtual content with the real world

I don’t though. Display and notifications covers everything I’d want. And if I need it to show me details about a business I’m facing, great, add GPS and a compass and it will know.

I like the concept of having a display in your glasses. I just don’t fathom why would you also put a camera on them.