• farcaller@fstab.sh
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    If you drop the projector, then airpods already do it better when paired with the watch. There’s no point in such a device at all, then.

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Airpods don’t have a camera though. 90% of my photos are of things I need to remember, like a shopping list or a specific product I need to get Having to dig out (or find) my phone to do that is a pain.

      And I don’t have Airpods because I’d lose them, one by one, and the replacements are twice the price as another pair of perfectly workable Bluetooth headphones.

      • efstajas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        If they wanted to companies could put a camera in a smart watch easily. Samsung was doing it ages ago.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          My kids have a crappy watch ($30-40) that has a camera. It’s not a technical problem, it’s just a stupid idea, it’s not an ergonomic place to use a camera.

          • efstajas@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            For sure, my point is just that they could if it made sense — so clearly they don’t think it does, at least for now.

          • stonehopper@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Bruh i’d worried about the privacy of your kids when wearing crappy cheap device with a camera on it