• NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I mean… they ARE telling you?

    Expect a LOT more companies to do stuff like this. Because “deep fake” porn is a plague and nobody (reputable) wants their software to be the go to for violating people.

    • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Photoshop != deepfake porn. Although it might get used to touch up some images for realism.

      Which isn’t where the money is in NSFW digital art.

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yes. Photoshop is not currently equal to deepfake porn. It is a few popular plugins away from being it though. Hence getting out ahead of things with content policies.

        And… NSFW digital art is not as good money as you think it is. At least, not at the corporate/software level.

          • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            I mean, have you seen Gadget?

            But also… that is kind of the point. Adobe and basically every company that isn’t a porn company doesn’t care about the revenue from porn. And the companies that DO care about the revenue are constantly fighting piracy.

            There are some patreon-like artists who make bank for getting their Source Film Maker on. But they are a handful of licenses, at best.