No it’s definitely not the same. A tan suit is just a matter of taste (pretty good taste if you ask me), and a laugh is part of you, it can’t really be changed, not honestly anyway. But nobody is just a “stinky” person, that’s a reflection of a lack of hygiene, a skill and habit that every competent adult and older child should have mastered, let alone a candidate for the highest office. How can he care for his constituents if he apparently doesn’t care for himself?
Grownups wash themselves, that’s the whole reason this is newsworthy
That’s actually hilarious
It was the serifs in their logo. They ditched those serifs and all bets on morality were off
They should run with “Make America Free Again”. Remind voters that “great” doesn’t necessarily mean great for them.
Yeah they need to keep him on the ropes
Oi bruv, it’s anova kitchin appluiance asking for moy woyfoy passwood.
Damn autocorrect was fighting me on every word lol
It’s the subject
I like it, they need to do ads with the monster truck rally voice.
"KAMALA CHAOS! RRRRRRALLY ON MONDAY!
MONDAY!
MONDAY!
WE’LL GIVE YOU THE WHOLE SEAT BUT YOU’LL ONLY
NEED
THE
EEEEEEEEDGGE"
Would it have been just as hard for you to cite your sources in the first place?
If not mandatory voting then at least automatic registration while sending out mail-in ballots to everyone by default. The USPS spends so much time and resources delivering junk-mail destined for the burn pile, what’s some unused mail-in ballots? The only excuse not to vote would be if you just didn’t want to.
Maybe there’s a security issue with this idea that I’m overlooking though, so I’m all ears.
Lmao someone crosspost to nottheonion
Personally I like small, lightweight cars because they’re fun to drive and somewhat efficient. Obviously the f150 doesn’t light my fire in that regard, but the model Y isn’t exactly a nimble little thing either. Between weight and annoying tech (screens and driver assist mostly), I’m honestly not interested in modern cars at all
You gonna eat that?
Doesn’t the existence of abusive parents throw a wrench in that logic?
It’s a moot point anyway because who decides how much more a parents vote is worth? You can’t have a real democracy when who gets to vote is decided by who gets to vote. Whoever has the voting power today will vote to tip the scales of democracy in their favor tomorrow, ad infinitum until we’re back to only white male landowners voting. What you’re arguing for is essentially a whole new dimension of gerrymandering.
“Sectional” fuckin hell dude 🤣
*for the last 8 years. I agree though. Maybe it’s naive but I’m feeling a little optimistic
I’ll be honest, I must’ve missed this one, so I for one don’t really mind
Logically yeah, the latter statement implies former