Fair, you did say years though, plural, which is still unrealistic

Recycling still consumes energy which can be just as non-renewable as the energy used for making paper, and the impact of mining is far greater than hemp farming even at its worst. Try harder.

In what universe is an electronic device being handled by children going to last 20 years? Not ours

The energy can be obtained from renewable sources any time we decide to quit fucking around and make it happen, wood pulp can be replaced with hemp far more easily than that and requires less chemical treatment in the process. There are no similar options for mitigating the negative impact of mining or making our supply of those metals any bigger.

Paper is a renewable resource, rare metals used in computers aren’t, and the contents of the dictionary will be the same either way

Knowing how to use a physical dictionary or do basic math in your head is absolutely still a good idea, your phone battery can die, your network connection can fail, and doing challenging things with your brain is good for your long term brain health anyway especially while it’s still developing.

Idk what part of me pointing out that you’re directly contradicting yourself made you want to post a paragraph from a children’s social studies book, have you perhaps considered logging off entirely

You literally said “that’s all we need” like 3 comments ago, you have been and continue to be wrong

All 9 of them together wouldn’t be enough to stop what’s happening

A handful of halfway decent people are definitely not all we need. It’s better than nothing for sure, but nowhere near enough to stop what’s happening to this country

That’s 2

That’s an extremely optimistic assessment

It’s not insane at all, the goal is to finish the process of turning the US into a superficially theocratic oligarchy, dismantling the few remaining legal barriers is an important step in that process

There is absolutely nothing preventing the SCOTUS from ruling in ways that are completely illogical and/or overtly unconstitutional, they can use the physical presence of non-citizens on US soil to justifiy whatever the fuck they want to do in the name of national security

I fucking wish

I understand your point just fine, it’s just that it’s a stupid point that bears no resemblance to reality. In the real world the lack of legal jurisdiction will protect them from absolutely nothing, the US can and will imprison or kill them with impunity.

Being subject to US laws would give them slightly more protection, not less. We’ve seen plenty of recent examples of the US doing whatever it wants with “illegal immigrants”, reality doesn’t give a shit what you think.

The other commenter already made compelling arguments, which you ignored

You are wrong

The democrats offered exactly zero “harm reduction” for palestine, the only harm you care about reducing is to yourself and you know it