It sounds like it is potentially more precise. You can use software to extrapolate the input without the typer realising their typing is being watched.
It sounds like it is potentially more precise. You can use software to extrapolate the input without the typer realising their typing is being watched.
In this case the difference is that you don’t need to be in the same room as the typer
The charges have nothing to do with the content he uploaded. Are people so ready to give their opinion on AI that they assume AI must be the reason he’s getting charged?
For me, console gaming was for when my desktop rig was doing a video export or 3d render. It was when I wanted to sit on the couch and not be too invested in what I was playing with.
I think the Botting of streams to game the royalties is the bit they don’t like.
Obviously it would be a beach of t&cs
Sure. Substitute “Lemmy” for whatever fediverse service it is mingling with.
If threads is incorporated into the larger fediverse, sure you’ll get a bump in dau, but threads will eventually dominate the user base. Then if they devide to cut ties with Lemmy sites, the fediverse basically loses 90% of engagement overnight.
Oh yea? Well, why doesn’t Ross, the larger of the friends, simply eat the other friends?
If it’s the demonstration I’m thinking of, it uses gravity to visualise the affects of an otherwise invisible force.
You are looking at this with a bias of “too much fishing is bad”, but this could also be looked at as a boat will need to spend less time in the water to reach their quota which means less pollution in the ocean and less harmful noise exposure to underwater life.
Technology is neutral, how’s it’s used is ethics.
Do you have any tips for writing professional documentation? I want to do some for my workplace but it’s hard to know where to start, how to arrange it, etc
What are the chances that Crowdstrike started using ai to do their update deployments, and they just won’t admit it?
That’s kind of why they are successful though, right? They were the ones that figured out how to supply games digitally for a profit, which required a way to prevent people from sharing the product for free. This was previously done with CD keys, but the advent of the internet rendered that mostly ineffective.
Going through a scalper means that the ticket supply is artificially decreased, which pumps up the price. Then you run the risk of your ticket not working when you turn up to the venue.
You’d rather have 2 middle men for your ticket purchase?
No straw though, right? You’re in the clear.
I know this is true, but I find it bizarre that there’s this fixation on straws and not the hundred other things we are likely doing that also kills turtles.
It’s like someone saw that viral video of the turtle with a straw up it’s nose and decided that’s the only thing to focus on.
You are thinking about IP with tunnel vision. You just want to gain entertainment for free. There’s more than that to IP laws. How would you like it if you made art that was then used in a manner that you philosophically disagree with. For example, Meghan Trainor had a song that was used against her will in a political campaign against same sex marriage, she was able to cease and desist this use because of IP laws.
I think there’s room for improvement on copyright laws, but that’s a far cry from the outrageous claim that intellectual property isn’t a real thing.
It was the best of times, it was the blurst of times!?