I mean… Yes?

They don’t need to lie to sell their oppression. They just do it because they’re authoritarian.

I don’t know about all.

I do know of one, though, that he had children with, and didn’t free after he died. A lot of people know this.

What a lot of people don’t know, is that she was his wife’s half sister. She was the off spring of his wife’s father raping a slave. When the half sister was born, she was given to her half sister as property because of the mother that gave birth to her.

Slavery is always monstrous, but it was made even worse by the monsters in human flesh that practiced it in the south.

Remember this story when you have some southern fuck wit try and romanticize that time period.

Fake-08 is explicitly supports p8.PNG files: https://github.com/jtothebell/fake-08

However, not all games are compatible with fake-08.

I have. And you know what? Genocide isn’t a matter of disagreeing. The fact that you think it is says everything anyone needs to know about you.

I’m 45.

Supporting genocide is a good reductive test for if someone has any kind of morality. Same as with racism.

The fact that you don’t recognize that, and think that not recognizing that makes you an adult that is not a cartoon says everything about your morality.

It says nothing about my age or how many people I interact with.

EDIT: You also didn’t answer the question on why you think Genocide shouldn’t be a reductive label.

Do you think that genocide is ever justifiable?

I’d spend more time on a response to someone that doesn’t make bad faith arguments and supports genocide.

For you, though? No.

I don’t need to try again, but when you post seemingly innocuous opinions that tangentially touch on your support for genocide without referencing it, and I see it, I will post so that others will know that they are interacting with something posted by someone that supports genocide.

Genocide is something that should be reductively absolute.

Why do you think it shouldn’t be?

If you support genocide, that should be something you are saddled with for the rest of your life.

And yet.

Who was wrong about Walz.

Why do you think you were wrong?

Yeah, it is.

Yeah, but you celebrate the genocide. I know you post a lot so the arguments between us from months ago will be far back in the history, but there is nothing surprising about someone who justifies genocide siding with the candidate who served in the military that is currently committing genocide.

It’s relevant because that is what you are using. It sure as hell isn’t logic or data.

'Improperly collected data failed us once, so it always will" is literally the same thing as what you are saying.

It ignores any changes in methodology that occurred in 8 years. It ignores identified biases that have been removed.

It’s literally am anti-science point of view.

E.g. your gut. It sure as hell isn’t coming from your brain.

Your response was irrelevant. It’s not even data. It’s a literal named fallacy.

“Trump won once, so he will again” is literally the same statement.

Take a critical thinking class, cause you really don’t know how.

Your gut is not data.

So… Let me get this right. Your only response is literally a named fallacy?

What does your gut say the stock market will do next month, oh wonderful and correct Oracle?

Four months before a presidential election. With the known American attention span.

You do realize that those two facts mean the opposite is what you imply in your comment, right?

Given that every point of data shows Trump winning in a landside, and probably getting the house and Senate, if Biden stays in suggests that people advocating for Biden staying in want Trump to win.

See what I did there?

Fun fact, actual data supports one and only one of us.

Are you a Russian bot that wants Trump to win?

Where do you live? 1600 Pennsylvania ave?

Literally every point of actual data disagrees with you.

Also, she was racist.