Dariusmiles2123

Having music in peertube would be nice, but I think the artist would have to have some kind of paywall or a Patreon…

I agree with you but I would still want numbers to go up a little bit, not down the way they are apparently.

What is the difference with Lemmy? What’s better and worse with Piefed?

gardiner_bryant@subscribeto.me Gardiner Bryant for gaming news the Linuxexperiment_channel@tilvids.com Linux Exclusif erikent for Linux and open source news

I won’t donate now as I only do that at the end of the year, but I’m really happy about Peertube getting a good mobile app!

Thanks for the link.

I’ve created the request and you can vote for it https://ideas.joinpeertube.org/posts/285/allow-creators-to-make-their-channel-watcheable-only-with-financial-support

Yeah and the arrival of the mobile app with the ability to log into your account is a huge step.

The next step would be to be able to lock some content for people who are not supporting creators (to motivate creators to post on peertube and make money with it).

Oh great!

I had been using the Beta version which added online accounts a while ago.

I’m looking forward to trying 1.0✌️

Wow what a surprise!

Let’s hope it takes off and remains there for a really long time with a bit more users.

Oh great you made me discover that on the Beta on ios I can log in.

I enjoy his content a lot and really appreciate the fact that hés putting his content on peertube.

I hope people enjoying Peertube are supporting the project and creators financially. Otherwise it won’t have any future sadly.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=q2521SzqBWc

This helped save a few of the earphones you get with iPhones.

I think every creator should be contacted before doing duch a thing and I guess a lot would not agree since most of them wouldn’t make any money on Peertube except if people support them through something like Patreon.

As long as you have a way to know if it’s a Signal to whatsapp conversation, I don’t see the problem.

If you only want to talk to Signal users, you could just deactivate the interooerability option.

It’s surprising that games are getting cheaper compared to the cost of living. If you take into consideration the fact that games are becoming more expensive to produce, I really don’t understand it.

Gaming is way cheaper for me than it was during the ps2 or ps3 era.

Still, I don’t want games to become more and more ambitious and cost more and more. So, if I get GTA6, it’s gonna be at a reasonable price, maybe even second hand since I don’t need to directly support Rockstar.

That sounds really interesting. I didn’t know about Volla, but dual booting might be the way to go.

These brands selling their own refurbished products is great news.

It gives you the ability to still support them while not creating directly more e-waste and benefitting from a cheaper price.

Yeah I’m always surprised when people are complaining about the cost to buy (not to produce) a game nowadays.

Where I live, games are way cheaper than they used to be during the Playstation 1 Era and it’s now really easy to buy used games online.

Of course if you buy every season pass or special skin for they used to game, it ends up more expensive.

Well I meant more something like you driving a car fast in an open world and having objects appearing in front of you because everything isn’t loaded yet.

Or landscape disappearing from your rear view mirror in racing games in order to save some memory.

These things wouldn’t cost anything to solve if we gave up some graphical fidelity.

I think it’s crazy that we always want prettier games when you still have visual glitches like cars disappearing in your rearview mirror, buildings and textures appearing late, screen tearing when you make your POV spin.

I don’t really need way better graphics, but I’d need these things gone as they take me out of my game way more than no raytracing or a slight fps drop.

I think these things would be easy to solve if we didn’t always get better graphics.