Kangae_Hishiryo

Khosla was stupid though, he should’ve just use Linux plus COLLABORA Office and/or LibreOffice.

You forgot that and .

You can omit the paywall using a web archive like Archive.is or Wayback Machine. Or using uBlock Origin. Or using Unpaywall.

I’m just doing this by going to ARRR my music and install Smolsonic.

Yes, I totally understand the logic. It’s just a transitivity problem, and can be modeled using a cost-benefit analysis:

1. A hidden camera is more dangerous for the victim because it is less risky for the creep/abuser.
2. You will not reasonably believe that a doctor will have a hidden camera inside his office.
3. A camera exposed to the naked eye is less dangerous for the victim because it is more risky for the creep/abuser.
   • The abuser is unlikely to take that risk because he could lose too much, much more than he would gain.
4. So it is reasonable not to believe that your doctor will record or photograph you with a camera exposed to the naked eye since it is inherently riskier for the creep, and it is not reasonable to believe otherwise.

Although, the problem here then shifts to the hardware itself. Like, since these lenses were probably closed source and proprietary hardware, and their software as well, then you don’t have a way to prove that if you turn off the camera on said lens (either via the software kill-switch or via the hardware kill-switch) it is actually turning off, or just appears to turn off when it is actually still on but disguised as being turned off. And taking into account that there are precedents of devices doing this (a particularly famous case was that of a smart TV that even when you turned it off, it was not really off, but in a false shutdown, a very low power state where the screen was off, but the core and some telemetry processes, and the microphone, were still running and, thus, recording and sending everything that was recorded to their servers). So the only rational position, at least from a Game Theory point of view, is to assume that every device that is both closed source and closed hardware, that is not Free, Libre and Open Source Software, and Libre and Open Source and Schematics Hardware (yeah, even releasing their schematics), does the same thing.

I’m not sure why, maybe is because I live perpetually overstressed and I’m dyscalculic, but I can’t just understand anything about the part of actually writing code. Like, I can conceptually and theoretically know really much about programming, programming languages and how they work (and how they would work better), but when it comes to start learning the syntax and what every symbol, word and all that means and how do they combine… Oopsie.

In few words, I do understand the theory, all the concepts and the programming semantics, but the code grammar is hard for me, and the syntax is nearly impossible as it involves too much maths.

As architecture and design are more about natural language and logical reasoning, and I’m actually good in those two things (I have hyperlogia [if “hypercalculia” is the polar opposite of dyscalculia, then this is the same for dyslogia]), or at least can be totally done without any maths and totally with only these two things (because yeah, symbolic logic is also hard for me), I can do these things to a pretty good extent.

Hope this allows you to better undertand. 😄

They CAN be owned. Particularly art.

And I say this even when I’m anti-copyright and pro-copyleft, but even then I don’t want to lose my means of work and subsistence and my moral rights.

Also, much of that gets even worse when AI gets trained with works that you didn’t even published yet, but that a hidden background AI process scraped in the platform you used to backup, plan or talk about that works. I’m talking out of experience.

As an artist that see his work opportunities reduced by the IP theft, stfu, and maybe evenn go kys.

For me the part before it is the only easy one lol. For the rest, I don’t even know how to program anything more than a basic Hello World in Python.

Yeah, I was not discussing that, I’m with you on that. What I’m talking is about the broader concept and appliance of religious exemptions (you do not pay the same amount of taxes [but a minor amount], or you do not pay taxes at all, because you are religious).

Because, if I understood well, that’s also being defunded, and I’m in favor of that, even while I’m not favorable to the idea of defunding them in general, because they still make a valuable social labor.

Sorry if I’m explaining myself bad.

Like, religious schools are still receiving an special benefit just because they’re religious, which is unfair. I also think that the more general defunding is bad, but school or not, you shouldn’t receive any special treatment just because of your religious nature.

Although I think religious exemptions should be widely prohibited

Yeah, Russia and China bootlickers.

I don’t know what are the worse ones, tho, if these two of the US bootlickers.

It’s hard to decide.

I truly don’t want to try your app… I don’t want all my data leaked or my PC, laptop or phone bricked just because a dumb AI-slop code error.

AI is changing everything… Mostly to bad, that’s the part they keep.

I was referring to “You should do that but you shouldn’t do that” lmao, because I was recognizing that it was a straw man, as I only said it as a joke.

“You should do that but you shouldn’t do that”

Anyways, besides the straw man, the point is that I don’t even consider that to be bad, so I think that saying that it shouldn’t be done — even if merely at the moral-level, but not at the legal level — it’s problematic.

Edit: The straw man is “You should do that but you shouldn’t do that”, that’s simply a joke.

Saying something isn’t good is the same to say that something shouldn’t be done, is a logic equivalence in ethics.

I love how almost everybody defederates with Lemmygrade lmao

Bro, they sell the DM and Stories on Snapchat to be private “if you decide so”. They do separate private Stories (that supposedly are only shared with people you whitelist) and public Stories, and the same with DM. I know as I have used Snapchat back in 2021, before I got heavily interested in privacy. Maybe some things have changed, but they do still sell, promote and do marketing stuff telling that it is private. Yeah, we do know it’s false, but trust me that marketing can be a powerful force.