It means we have less insight on what they are doing with our passwords.
It means we have less insight on what they are doing with our passwords.
By the end I completely forgot he was talking about San Francisco, and I think that is the point.
The difference being that the owners of the works in museums have given permission to view the content, and the people viewing the content are rarely trying to resell what they are seeing.
I have never had a phone that has successfully unlocked the first time using biometrics. I wouldn’t say it is a solved problem or a solution. There are also implications with law enforcement when using biometrics. They can’t force you to unlock something with a password, but they can forcefully unlock something with your fingerprint.
A key reminder the “One vote doesn’t matter.” argument is bull crap when hundreds of thousands of people have that mentality. One vote doesn’t matter when everyone else actually votes. Hundreds of thousands are not voting. Stop being a prick and go vote.
They treat you like a child with no self respect. They are awful.
It’s their right and all, but I don’t want to hear how their international sales have dropped and how profits are down.
Of course the better politicians win with ranked voting. That’s why we don’t have it.
I’ve never really thought about it this way. Good point.
At this rate he will never be able to vote.