I’m not entirely sure what you’re saying here.

I’m not applying it to all women. The discussion was mainly centered around the reactions and that they existed. And the possibility that the outrage was stoked and pushed towards certain extremes in order to provide an excuse.

Well yes but I haven’t posted any of the more violent parodies. I’d rather not.

I also want to point out that I’m not agreeing with this in any way shape or form, but rather I like many others predicted it unfortunately.

Well, none of this was anything new to me. I have read Lemon Clot as well.

Again, I’m very sympathetic towards this and a lot of this does apply to Clancy, but she’s also in a different class than most women. She had access to a lot more than the average woman did, hence why I struggle to understand the surge of sympathy towards her in particular.

This is why I mentioned my possible lack of knowledge on the case.

Yeah I agree with this.

Some of these TikToks have gone viral and they’ve been incredibly extreme, with some of them showing women discussing wanting to murder their children(without any irony or satire).

Even videos that clearly are parody have felt dangerous because the right preys upon people not knowing where the boundaries between irony/satire/parody is and genuine belief in what the content is presenting.

Besides the psychosis can you explain to me what else they might be empathizing with?

Maybe I’m missing knowledge about the case somewhere but I have tried to go over the various points of the case that I’m aware of in order to give her some validation and I’ve really struggled.

Edit

I appreciate your time and what you have shared. I decided to spend more time googling the case and looking up the details.

I don’t disagree with anything you’ve shared at all.

That said, some of the more extreme viral content of people showing solidarity with her has been people making content showing them pretend to hurt their children.

We are both well aware that conservatives are always scheming about ways in which to remove the rights of others. So yes, I do think there is merit to the idea that this was astroturfed someway in order to provide them with a casus belli.

I hope any reporter that has to tolerate being in his presence is paid well.

As someone that’s been stalked twice before the flock cameras are terrifying. I’ve always been taught to keep my head down and avoid attracting attention but it just seems inevitable these days that someone is going to do this.

If that’s what it takes to get regulation for them I suppose.

Yeah it’s difficult convincing people due to sunken cost.

You could be chatting on a better platform that offers everything discord offers for free but you’d have to convince your friends and the servers you frequent to all move.

It’s not about the platform itself as much as it’s about the communities that are all already there.

Even the one person I know who is terrified of losing her account and preemptively set up alternatives on other platforms still won’t leave until something forces her.

It’ll be both good and bad if it happens.

While it’ll be great for the threadiverse to have more growth it will inevitably put us in the crosshairs of bot farms and AI data farmers.

So is he fishing around for a cassus belli or is he simply attempting to further isolate us?

Doesn’t matter what anyone says at this point. A lot of the damage is done.

Anyone regardless of generation who voted for him might be sorrowful now but they haven’t changed. They’d absolutely vote for Trump again.