Why does the tribunally selected autocrat of a foreign nation intent on raping children get to tell me anything about democracy or evil?
Why does the tribunally selected autocrat of a foreign nation intent on raping children get to tell me anything about democracy or evil?
Ugh, when your warts have warts…
Really, the media finally realized millennials don’t care if we killed Applebee’s or whatever, and they’ve moved on to the next thing to scare boomers with. “They hate us because we buy bags of paper napkins” becomes “They hate us because we can use old style keyboards.” Generations are not a monolith. You can compare them, but it’s stupid to pass judgment in that way.
There’s one I see around town often enough. I was parked at a red light next to it the other day and it was remarkable how shitty the panels look up close. They’re not really flat and planar. They’re sort of wobbly like corrugated tin.
They can’t be above this rumor because their position on drag and trans issues are beneath it.
Sometimes the couch wants to top.
This is such a long odds parlay that I almost want to take you up on it.
We don’t claim him.
This is much, much “higher” than the right.
Yeah, that’s why “no you” doesn’t work here. I know I’m a weirdo. I like being a weirdo and hanging out with other weirdos. You call me a weirdo and I’m like, “Yeah, cool.”
But group identity is everything to a conservative. Conservatism, as it has been said, depends on an in-group and an out-group. “Weird” could only ever be a pejorative to the conservative who really needs to conform and not be weird. A person who accepts the diversity of humanity doesn’t need everyone to be the same, so weirdness isn’t really all that weird. When the in-group is weird, it’s not an insult.
Yep, that’s the point I was making.
Those other Christians aren’t true Christians.
I thought it was Hoobastank.
God damn you.
I saw the same document. It was thoroughly disgusting and more or less describes what you said. I’m not making excuses for anyone, but they’re also just allegations. I would very much like to see them demonstrated in a court of law, but I don’t know that that’s really possible at this point.
Well, the god of the Bible is a malevolent narcissist, and they do strive to be godly.
It’s very, very costly, both but the hardware and the electricity it takes to run it. There may be a bit of sunk cost fallacy at play for some, especially the execs who are calling for AI Everything, but in the end, in AI doesn’t generate enough increase in revenue to offset its operational costs, even those execs will bow out. I think the economics of AI will cause the bubble to burst because end users aren’t going to pay money for a service that does a mediocre job at most things but costs more.
First, I didn’t say the people shouldn’t be respected. I said faith shouldn’t be. It’s the worst, least reliable way to draw conclusions about the world. A method that only ever produces falsehoods is not respectable. Why should I respect it?
Why should faith be respected?
Sounds illegal. They’re not supposed to endorse candidates while not having to pay taxes. IRS should end this church.