This is normal for someone newly elected. Hopes are high.

It’s on record that Gabe is very aware of Microsoft’s desktop dominance and ability to fuck up his gaming business. Valve’s push to Linux is strategic de-risking.

deleted by creator

Simply not true. There is no person out there deciding every fry is too small. They just pick an exploit and send some bots after it. Every target is a good target because every target is a platform for more. It’s currency. The discrimination happens at the userbase level which is why jellyfin will always be safe. Kidding 😂

Symphonium is awesome. Still looking for a nice desktop alternative to Plexamp, which I can’t stand for its interface on desktop.

As do you, friend.

Holy shit, just give me shareable calendars!

There are still many ways the files can be suppressed.

I’m getting the feeling that most people wouldn’t hate AI so much if it wasn’t: 1. Built of the labor of let’s without fair compensation, and 2. Wasn’t a privacy nightmare. I think people would be okay with it even in spite of the energy usage because that’s something that can be optimized over time. But these other points are systemic societal issues that the current approach to AI entrenches.

There’s like a million other free/libre digital document signing platforms out there. Try one that doesn’t suck.

Halal food is delicious. I don’t see the problem.

No, this is food for exploit-searching AI. Private comments and tickets, etc is what they use to leverage targeted attacks.

Because it’s an incentive to make money, not an incentive to be a good corporation making good products and services.

The IP isn’t even that important. They straight gave up that person’s phone number and identified them.

This is just a small part of the perpetual cycle of growth and contraction. Growth comes from breakthroughs and innovations. Contraction comes from mis-allocation of resources and the need to extract efficiency from the breakthrough and innovation.

So now everything is booming and growing. This will slow down and if it becomes efficient enough it will remain useful and accessible. If not, it will be discarded and another breakthrough will take its place.

It was necessary. The tech is so expensive to run and develop that getting customers to actually use it and build demand was essential to the tech’s survival.

Nobody smearing I merely find your stance interesting.

Interesting that you think illegal kidnapping, unabated corruption, and disassembly of government institutions is theater.

Which of them help normies monetize their videos?

It’s not even on principle. From a pure business perspective, giving a funder the right to claw back money you previously spent is insanity.