breakfastmtn
He/Him
Sneaking all around the fediverse.
Also at breakfastmtm@fedia.social breakfastmtn@pixelfed.social
- 123 Posts
- 181 Comments
breakfastmtn@lemmy.cato
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Mastodon is testing easier ways to get you started in the fediverseEnglish
5·24 days agoYou know that’s not a real alternative. I wish it was – it’d make all of this a hell of a lot easier to navigate. But it just isn’t.
breakfastmtn@lemmy.cato
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Mastodon is testing easier ways to get you started in the fediverseEnglish
114·24 days agoI’d take an alternative if you’ve got one. Otherwise, unless there’s a serious change for the worse, I’m probably going to keep posting them. Sorry!
breakfastmtn@lemmy.caOPto
politics @lemmy.world•Grand Juries Tend to Defer to Prosecutors. Not in This Justice Dept. Case
3·25 days agoThe craziest thing, that isn’t actually mentioned in the article, is that not a single person out of 23 voted to indict. Not one.
breakfastmtn@lemmy.caOPto
politics @lemmy.world•Conspiracy Theories Only Flourish With More Epstein Evidence
3·1 month agoThe case of the posthumous video games:
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/epstein-fortnite/
The official @FortniteStatus X account, responding to another user, posted (archived) on Feb. 6 that a user changed their name to littlestjeff1 after the name surfaced in the Epstein files, saying in part, “Hey Official Fortnite here - this was a ruse by a Fortnite player. A few days ago, an existing Fortnite account owner changed their username from something totally unrelated to littlestjeff1, following the revelation of littlestjeff1 as a name on YouTube.”
The post also said none of Epstein’s email addresses listed in the public-facing case files exist in the game’s account system.
The case of the day-before-email:
https://www.snopes.com/news/2026/02/10/epstein-press-release-aug-10/
From a DOJ spokesperson:
Official statements regarding the death of Jeffrey Epstein were edited and circulated over several email chains within the Southern District of New York beginning August 10, 2019. While initial drafts of the statement list the previous date, this was merely an unfortunate typo that was later updated to reflect the correct date before being publicized. Any suggestion that the Department drafted a statement in advance of Jeffrey Epstein’s death is false.
Also:
Searches for the Aug. 10 news release revealed correspondence between FBI staff on Aug. 10 about what appeared to be the finished news release that Biase sent. Searches of the DOJ’s database did not reveal records of DOJ, U.S. attorney’s office or FBI staff discussing the versions of the news release dated Aug. 9, suggesting it wasn’t circulated internally or externally in the DOJ before Epstein’s death.
breakfastmtn@lemmy.caOPto
politics @lemmy.world•Trump Says His Unpredictable Style Gives Him Leverage. But It Has a Cost.
21·1 month agoBOOOOOOORRRRRING
breakfastmtn@lemmy.caOPto
politics @lemmy.world•Trump’s Letter to Norway Should Be the Last Straw
2·2 months agoTotally. It is a fun fact!
breakfastmtn@lemmy.caOPto
politics @lemmy.world•Trump’s Letter to Norway Should Be the Last Straw
7·2 months agoHe’s currently Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs.
And in case anyone reading takes her professional credentials to be “wife” instead of just taking it as a fun fact, she’s a renowned journalist, a Pulitzer Prize-winning author, and one of the world’s most important experts on modern authoritarianism. wiki
Yeah, I agree. I said you wouldn’t be spamming.
It sounds like you’re grabbing posts about topics you’re interested in, knowledgeable about, and that you want to talk about. It’s almost like having a deck of cards with conversation topics on them and just drawing a random one every few days or something.
You should probably get consent from communities you want to include. I appreciate that you have good intentions and wouldn’t be spamming communities, but this is the kind of thing that people can get pretty angry about.
breakfastmtn@lemmy.cato
politics @lemmy.world•Trump accepts Nobel medal from Venezuelan opposition leader Machado
32·2 months agohaha oh man what a loser
breakfastmtn@lemmy.cato
Gaming@beehaw.org•Weekly “What are you playing” Thread || Week of January 12th
2·2 months agoI made the mistake of giving robo wingman a gatling turret.

breakfastmtn@lemmy.cato
Gaming@beehaw.org•Weekly “What are you playing” Thread || Week of January 12th
2·2 months agoI’ve done a few solo+robo runs with the small ship and it’s a great time. It’s a bit less chaotic because there are some ship effects (like fires and radiation leaks) that don’t get enabled until you have at least 3 players. I’m excited to see how the game develops over the next few months.
breakfastmtn@lemmy.cato
Fediverse@lemmy.world•New Social Web Working Group at W3CEnglish
13·2 months agoOne Community Group document that will be moving into the Working Group is LOLA, the live data portability spec that originated in the CG’s Data Portability Task Force. LOLA lets users move from one ActivityPub server to another while retaining all their social connections, their content, and their reactions. It’s a great improvement for data portability on the social web.
Exciting stuff!
breakfastmtn@lemmy.cato
politics @lemmy.world•Explosive Epstein Witness Testimony Implicates Trump, Clarence Thomas, and More in Horrific Abuse - NOTICE News
16·2 months agotl;dr It seems sketchy.
The founder of notice news (and author of this story), Andrew Springer, is a real dude. He seems to have mostly worked at news organizations running their social media. He claims to be an “emmy and peabody award-winning journalist,” but he was not working as a journalist when either of those awards were won. In 2012, Good Morning America won an emmy. He was a “social media producer.” In 2013, ABC News won a Peabody for Hurricane Sandy coverage. Again, he was a social media producer. His bio/CV is here.
Looking at his author page on that site, they claim that he’s published nearly 20 stories in the last 48 hours. Seems unrealistic. Plagiarism? AI? Both seem more likely to me. They don’t have an entry with any bias monitoring organization that I can find.
As for Voldeng, I can’t find much on her but she seems like a bit of a grifter. This is her bio on her brand page:
I create what others often call impossible. I stand for my brand. I build to protect. And I protect what I know in my own knowing way, is right for me to protect.
My work spans every sweep of civilization, and beyond.
From advertising, aerospace, defense, education, energy, environment, finance, governance, law, media, science, and technology, to realms of sheer starlit wonder.
She does it all!
She sells access to different tiers (prices not listed) of “The Knight League”, which is described like this:
The League of the Almighty, on Earth.
It is a fellowship and a calling. Where warrior knights are trained in courage, discipline, and joy. Where oaths matter, crests are borne with honour, and training is effortless lived practice. Where knights rise — noble, ferocious, joyful, Jedi-esque — to stand for something higher. The Most High.
What the fuck is the Knight League? No idea. All her descriptions are master classes in assembling words to say next to nothing. The link that @loppy@fedia.io posted is another great example. I have no idea what it is but I know it wants your money.
I’d be very skeptical of either of those people in terms of vetting sources or doing serious journalism.
breakfastmtn@lemmy.caOPto
politics @lemmy.world•X claims it has stopped Grok from undressing people, but of course it hasn’t
61·2 months agoTwitter ghouls.
breakfastmtn@lemmy.cato
Gaming@beehaw.org•Weekly “What are you playing” Thread || Week of January 12th
4·2 months agoI’ve been having a great time playing Jump Space with some pals.
breakfastmtn@lemmy.caOPto
politics @lemmy.world•California investigates Grok over AI deepfakes
8·2 months agoYeah, it’s really making CSAM production a subscription service. Vile.
breakfastmtn@lemmy.caOPto
politics @lemmy.world•Department of Labor under fire for language similar to Nazi slogan
3·2 months agoI updated the archive link. The caption’s gone now.

Scroll down. Archive.today can archive things other services can’t. That’s why Wikipedia was in a panic about the verifiability crisis removing their 700 000 links would cause. Most can’t be replaced.
Okay, I’m just gonna explain where I’m at with this right now and why.
This isn’t a huge issue for this community but for our hard news discussion communities, abandoning archive.today would instantly make a large amount of news inaccessible (probably 1/3 or more, but that’s just a guess) to the vast majority. It could limit being fully informed to those with means. That would suck. It’s a real harm.
We’re in agreement that archive.today is problematic. We really need a working alternative. The ddos attack is shitty and immature. It’s a betrayal of trust. However, the victim stated in the Ars article you linked to that this hasn’t really had any discernible impact on them. So for now it’s a theoretical harm (and an abhorrent practice) vs a real harm.
For me, as it stands now, I’ll use alternatives where I can and use archive.today where I can’t because I care a lot about that harm. I’ll be ecstatic when a real alternative emerges. Like Wikipedia fell into different camps, we’re probably similar. I respect that you come down on this differently, but that’s where I’m at with this.