How long can you oppose Trump and not become a former official?
Less paperwork
I think they were putting them in gen x and Vance in millennial.
Did the kid want his hair cut? That seems like the most important consideration and is totally absent.
Right? Grown ups can be trusted to get their work done without someone watching them all the time. It’s small children who need constant supervision.
Some people think the president can just do whatever they want.
In exchange, Microsoft can give them some special access or special keys or some backdoor.
They might be doing this. The thing is, putting something like that in makes so much more likely you’ll accidentally create an exploit for other actors as well. It’s why security experts are so against backdoors. They fundamentally compromise security.
The presented scenario was comparing not forgiving loans to not releasing people for drug convictions. I don’t see how you can say going into debt for an education was a poorer choice than risking a conviction and jail time for weed.
The illegal part is key to it being at least as stupid. A drug conviction can change your life just as surely as student debt.
Doing illegal drugs is at least as dumb a choice as getting into debt to get an education.
Ok then switch to streaming. My point was just that just because you have a VHS collection doesn’t mean you can’t get media in another way and still use your VHS collection. And most people would use both while they transitioned. Throwing out all your VHSs for the hot new thing isn’t something a lot of people did. Or throwing out all your DVDs because streaming is a thing. People aren’t restricted to one thing.
My point is people still used that VHSs. They just also bought DVDs. For most people, you didn’t only use one. I think most people went through a period where they used both.
They may have met Pakistani people but aren’t going to pay enough attention to know that. They’ll just go with some generic Muslim slur (it does not matter if they aren’t Muslim).
Because they’re engaging in harmful behaviors and need to be broken up and regulated.
I’m not talking about replacing your VHS collection but buying DVDs in addition. You would still watch both. Maybe buying a DVD player was a barrier. But it wasn’t that you owned VHS.
You don’t pre-emptively punish people not causing harm. That’s a bad way to go.
You don’t need to bring your library. Having your library split between multiple platforms isn’t a big deal and most people do it. You just don’t give them any more money.
People didn’t not buy DVDs because they had a library of VHSs.
“Let’s wait for them to start doing illegal stuff before we use the law against them.” Yeah, of course.
But it’s the only reason we have the ACA. Which, while only ok, is so much better than not having the ACA.