Or for a more contemporary example, see Mike Pence.
Or for a more contemporary example, see Mike Pence.
I’m not afraid of shit. Jill Stein has proven she’s anti-science with her stances on GMOs and vaccines. She’s proven she’s politically illiterate and unfit for office by not being able to answer simple questions about our government. And she’s proven she’s a Russian asset by meeting with Putin officials and encouraging people to vote for Donald Trump.
Exactly. He’s still the same person who thinks Trump is “America’s Hitler”, he just realized he has a lot to gain from being Hitler’s #2.
She was openly against gay people up until only about a few years ago when she switched to being against trans people.
They’re trying to get Trump elected so that they can make insane amounts of unregulated, tax free money and fuck over everyone else.
Exactly. Trump and Vance cannot condemn drag shows as “over-sexualized grooming behavior” without first explaining how it’s ok for Vance to cross-dress and for Trump to motorboat drag queen Rudy Giuliani. You can’t have it both ways guys.
“I hope Tim Walz sexually assaulted teenage boys so we can use it against him” would be such an eye opener if these people had the ability to think about what they were posting.
Wow that actually looks really cool. Now, how much do I owe you?
There once was a man from the Kremlin,
A fascist, war-mongering gremlin.
To strengthen his rule,
He empowered a fool,
Now the voters have both of them tremblin’.
This take will probably be unpopular, but FWIW I agree with you. I rarely use the community feature and I don’t care about the trading so personally I would like it if they just stuck with what they do well.
“And here is my hard drive dedicated to game launchers and storefronts.”
Fuck polls. Only voting matters. Don’t get complacent.
Yes, post-offence conduct is commonly used as circumstantial evidence in trial. Regarding the hush money case, I think a big goal for Trump’s team is to delay the sentencing until after the election.
Effectively yes. The SCOTUS has been hard at work over the past few months dismantling government checks and balances. They’ve ruled that politicians can throw out rulings from experts, take bribes without consequence, and attempt to overthrow the results of an election.
Lots of people in this thread are asking why this would pertain to the case since it was only official acts that were covered in the Supreme Court ruling.
Although the Manhattan case does not center on Mr. Trump’s presidency or official acts — but rather personal activity during his campaign — his lawyers argued on Monday that prosecutors had built their case partly on evidence from his time in the White House. And under the Supreme Court’s new ruling, prosecutors not only cannot charge a president for any official acts, but also cannot cite evidence involving official acts to bolster other accusations.
For those who forgot polls don’t mean shit and only voting matters:
I am a beautiful butterfly. Here is my head, heeeere is my thorax. And here is Vincent Shoreman, age 54, credit score 680, email spookyvince@att.net, loves new shoes, fears spiders…
The Graham thing is pretty obvious, and would make me feel bad for him having to constantly hide his sexuality if he didn’t choose to tie himself to a political ideology where being openly gay is political suicide.