Again, if you want to come across as wise, you have to come up with more than insults.

And if you want to rebut my points effectively, you have to come up with something more substantive than that they were a bit lengthy for your taste.

You won me round with number 4.

I’m old enough to know that I don’t respect someone who tries to make out that anyone who disagrees with them is stupid or a child, particularly when they themselves feel the need to comment on someone using big words too often.

I wondered whether you had to look it up and it annoyed you, so you went on the attack and defaulted to sneering. But I think it’s more likely that you immediately realised that your attempt to belittle them for questioning whether you were serious had backfired spectacularly and they were amused that your response answered the question vividly instead of having the desired effect, and that’s what made you try to make them look small.

You and I have different senses of humour. I find things funny when there’s a surprise other meaning or something like that, but you find things funny when you’re calling other people dumb. It’s just that this time the irony is that you accidentally assumed someone had to pay money to have come across the word disambiguation before today. Again “ooo, swallowed a dictionary, have you?” isn’t the ‘massive own’ playground bullies think it is.

In case it wasn’t clear, I think your sneering responses to disagreement throughout this thread make you sound deeply insecure. Those of us who disagree with you aren’t all naïve and teenaged as you like to pretend. Come up with better arguments than that. Marx and Engels were very, very intelligent men and you are doing them a disservice by acting like trump in defence of their ideals.

That’s all good stuff, 100%, but if the existing constitution had been upheld, Trump would be in prison instead of the White House.

Projecting? Projecting what?

Also, no reason to use your 25 cent word of the day more than once. No one is impressed twice by its use.

This you?

I’m far to old to be impressed by a new vocabulary word

For some of us, disambiguation wasn’t a new word, and in particular, I don’t think @ExFed@programming.dev was trying to impess you.

Bernie isn’t actually a Democrat. He’s independent.

Getting pissy at people for using a polysyllabic word twice isn’t coming across as the big own you seem to have been aiming for.

What the fuck do you mean by start over?

Once you’ve finished your starting over, would you reinstate Citizens United or abolish it?

Once you’ve started over, would you have free healthcare for all, or reinstate privatised insurance company-led doublepay healthcare?

Once you’ve started over, would you build millions of affordable homes, or are you planning on killing enough people that there’s a surplus already?

Once you’ve started over, would you charge for education or make it free?

Once you’ve started over, would you expand social security and reinstate traditional pensions, or reduce social security and continue to assume that everyone will be able to afford a good 401k?

Once you’ve started over, would you raise the minimum wage to an amount that people can realistically live on, or leave it so that corporations can underpay workers and leave social security to foot the bill instead or have starvation and homelessness as the warning to any prole stubborn enough to consider only working a single full time job?

Once you’ve started over, would you demand that the wealthiest people and three corporations pay their fair share of taxes, or would you allow all the tax avoidance schemes from before?

“Start over” is much, much, much emptier words that don’t have any hope of making anything better AT ALL than Bernie’s words.

If your only criticism of Bernie is that there just isn’t enough death and destruction for your tastes, but using that as a reason to disagree with his ideas is nonsensical.

If your criticism amounts to “death first”, then I have to tell you that Trump and ICE wholeheartedly agree with you.

If trump were able to count backwards, we’d be in trouble.

You’re right, of course, but I really enjoyed “fubuciary”. It’s a deliblicious misplomuncitation.

Yeah, the idea of Amazon running my home security did NOT appeal to me. I went with another brand.

Why would musk stop his pet ai doing what he wants it to do? He’s never done that in the past.

Removed by mod

Exactly. I wouldn’t touch a chromebook with a barge pole. Who wants Google to watch absolutely everything you do?

Ain’t no-one more politically exposed than one Donald J Trump.
So, probably, and as far as we know,
Ain’t no-one more redacted in the Epstein Files than that Donald J Trump.

I’d put the word president in front of his surname, but he’s not worthy of the honour, and he’s not worthy of the presidency.

I didn’t think there was anyone in the world who could make George W Bush look statesmanlike, well-informed, wise, responsible and honest. I was wrong.

If you had a single H2O molecule you wouldn’t notice it and wouldn’t call it water, so all water is touching other water, therefore all water is wet. QED.

More daughterfucker than motherfucker in his dreams and on Epstein’s plane, if you go by how he talks.

Removed by mod

Do you mean Idiocracy?

So much this.