I think Europe has been a bad place for them for a long time, because the church has put religious paranoia into their heads any also was petty terrible to them.
The only societies I can think of where they had a place were some indigenous American ones, where there was a role for people who are in connection with the spirit world.
No it’s not, that’s why some smart people are starring by defining a more interesting concept: educability.
Hey, I’m sorry I didn’t get a PhD in “Lemmy instance vibe checking” before I chose to go for the devs’ instance.
Fuck Trump, and fuck generalizing tribalism.
Weird how he’s helping the far right in both cases.
Did you know that you can click the headline to get to an actual article that you can read, which answers this question?
Negative rings are a horrible proprietary liability.
That’s been clear from their inception, and this changes nothing.
Doesn’t apply to the author here, so I don’t understand why you brought it up?
They accepted one that adds gender neutral pronouns in more than one place instead lol
Leftists who aren’t completely brain-dead will of course vote for his administration.
Are they aware that even an almost-corpse could follow their advisors and therefore end up having an effective presidency? As long as Biden doesn’t start doing random senile shit (and be realistic, he’s far from that)
Lol, have you seen a Republican recently?
If he loses. Maybe the complacent non-voters learned something. No thanks to the Ds, but neither Trump nor Biden winning is a done deal
Why would it? Biden stands for the policies they want. He’s also the more capable president, since he is actually able to correctly remember and cite statistics unlike Trump who is only interested in golf and polemics.
A perfect copy of you is you for all intents and purposes, otherwise I fully agree with your description.
That’s the last three words of the article. The author didn’t miss the connection either.
I always wonder when people repeat something from the article or ask a question that’s answered in the article: did you not read it or did you just want to start a discussion about this connection and are somehow constrained in the number of words you can write per day?
Putin wants the old borders of the Soviet Union back, not socialism.
That’s what I wrote …
Yeah, the Soviet Union, but with all the lip service to communism replaced by actual capitalism.
Not at all. There is a suspicious amount of trolls/idiots here but don’t think the people pushing back aren’t leftists. See e.g. me
The fact that there’s a lot of “leftists” on social media that propose voting third party in the next US general election. Due to the spoiler effect, everyone following that advice will help Trump getting elected.
These “leftists” are therefore either idiots or false flag actors (most likely Russian trolls, since Russia is known to both employ them and to benefit a lot from a Trump presidency)
I’d rather have neutral, fact based reporting. That one party endorses “alternative facts” was a choice by that party. It doesn’t mean that people more grounded in reality are biased.
In other words: if you are an US-American news source that reports neutrally, the vast majority of your staff will be voting Democrats.