Rotflmfao, even

Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good.

Damn that’s crazy! Where are the Epstein files?

“The Department of Justice, like it has in Republican and Democrat administrations in the past, is sending election monitors to places where there have been problems with the integrity of elections,” Dhillon later said

[evidence needed]

Microsoft Support has been shit for at least 10 years now.

Now look at 10TB drives.

Wisconsin trying not to get Foxconned again?

A newt?

Guess it’s finally going to be time to flip over to AppleTVs.

Yeah. I could see them deprecating O365 hooks and services or something, but the entire suite? That’s bullshit.

Nice. Definitely something to check out when I build my next HTPC.

What’s the minimum crew?

Disneyland now publicly acknowledges it uses face recognition, more like it.

I realize you are making a joke, and I agree that purchase is always better than subscription. Everyone in this situation owns their device.

But that doesn’t mean an easy to activate security bypass should be made available to everyone with no guardrails, either, should it?

It will likely have that effect on some, yes. It will also prevent it from being enabled without knowing the full scope of your ask. But that’s kind of the point— it’s a big deal, and the user should be informed. Not everyone is capable of understanding these decisions immediately and accurately assessing risk.

At some point, there is always, always a compromise between user experience and security, and not everyone is going to like it. But in this instance, I think the benefits of having this process and cool-down period to make the risks known far outweigh the need for immediate gratification by the minority of users that will enable and use this feature.

Hyperbole much?

This is a basic balance between the needs of the few, and the security of the many. The benefits of a one day speed bump are far more beneficial for the billions of Android users in the world, and offer no meaningful negatives to those that wish to enable this feature beyond that delay.

I realize that many people here are in or adjacent to IT work, and so are more passionate about these sorts of topics and are well versed in the risks, but in my opinion, allowing a simple, immediate way to bypass all security checks and install whatever you want immediately is a pretty big security hole, even if it is self-created. It makes sense to put those roadblocks up to protect the 99.9% that will never use this feature, as well as those that may activate it not understanding the risk. You may be comfortable with it, and that’s great, but that doesn’t mean every Android should. This is why prompts asking about coercion and not your IT prowess.

Finally. your example is poor. Google is not breaking into your phone and hurting you in way. If anything, it’s like a real estate agent that’s not giving you the keys until the bank opens so your check can clear. It’s a process issue, nothing more.

Your ability to use your device, as you see fit, installing anything you want, is entirely possible with a single one-day delay. As I said, I don’t think it is an unreasonable ask, nor the enormous inconvenience you make it out to be.

And they’re not. Load all the unsigned stuff you want after you wait one day. Again, I don’t see how this is a huge burden to ask.

While I understand your sentiment, with all due respect, they are giving you the control with this process. You’re only mad you have to wait one day one time before you can do it.