You missed the point.
The criticism here is that the EU is decising for the member states what they can be in debt for.
I personally am a federalist so I don’t care much about EU overreach, all the opposite, but this is what the article criticises.
Election interference? Nah, it’s endorsement
Corruption? Nah, it’s lobbyism
As a French, I’ll never understand how this shit is legal in the USA. We’ve sued presidents for much less than that.