I live in her new district, it’s rich republican territory, I would not get my hopes up.

Byaaaaaaaaa!

Seeing as how people have already been indicted for this shit, knowing that this is potentially coming, I don’t think they’re going to have the same kid gloves on this time. And the orange stain isn’t in power anymore. However we will see soon enough!

20 Decillion

https://celeryman.alexmeub.com/

(Not really mobile friendly, which holds true to the old school Internet)

I wonder what the mean jerk time is on a pair of ghosts?

NSA - no such agency

They would all be challenged to gentlemen’s duels so quickly, for abdicating their honor.

He raped his wife, it’s documented. He raped E Jean Carroll as well as probably many others. Triggered much that you support such a monster? Lame.

Good stuff! Thanks for adding

As crazy as all of this is, what’s even crazier is that the actual truth, which is the full unredacted truth of this, is probably orders of magnitude worse than what we as public citizens are aware of.

The fact that this is not disqualifying is insane to me.

We continue to find more drips of the truth that many of us expected all along each week, like Kavanaugh’s obstructed FBI investigation for example.

History will not be kind to trump or his supporters and enablers. That is, if we’re allowed to write the truth of history.

I’m sure no one here is on the fence about voting, but PLEASE don’t be apathetic about it, even if you’re in a solidly blue state. Vote like your life depends on it. It just may be that important.

Every. Single. Time this person posts they have an incredibly negative amount of votes. I have them tagged so that they’re easily identifiable. I would encourage everyone to do the same so you can save yourself time from having to read their posts.

They’re competing with the media bias checker bot for the lowest scores in history

🌎👨‍🚀🔫👨‍🚀

At least trump isn’t the incumbent this time, Biden can let the National Guard deal with them. FAFO

What you’re talking about is irrelevant, because the judge will operate in a manner that is consistent with her original ruling, and that insulates her from pushback or criticism. What happened a year ago is directly relevant here because it set the outcome.

Dammit, toilet paper and paper towels are made in the fucking USA, and this is only affecting the East coast dockworkers, and I still can’t get a single pack of TP to wipe my ass in Colorado. Mofos

Not to mention gerrymandering and voter intimidation / voter suppression in addition to the purging of rolls that you mentioned which also exist and are in play at all times.

You’re not quite correct, It’s actually much more nuanced than that. I’ll reply as soon as I’m off work and can put the right amount of effort into it.

EDIT - Here’s where your reply is incorrect -

Trump says it would be unfair to air this info before the election because he has a gag order, and because the government wants to release everything and Trump isn’t allowed to say anything. Judge Chutkan said that none of that is true - the gag order doesn’t say that, and the government’s position was ACTUALLY that they wanted to seal everything in this case a year ago when they were going over the protective order to determine what to release to the public. At that time, Jack Smith wanted to seal ALL the sensitive AND non-sensitive evidence. Trump opposed this and stated that there needed to be transparency and that the public needed to see the information (because he wanted to get the witness list down in florida). Back then Judge Chutkan ruled that only sensitive material should be redacted, ruling against Jack Smith’s desire to redact EVERYTHING. Judge Chutkan’s reasoning here was that for transparency reasons, the public had the right to see the non-sensitive material, which at the time Trump saw as a win for him.

Trump has now changed his position on this, since August of last year. Jack Smith wanted it all sealed, Trump wanted it all public, arguing that the sealing of it would violate his first amendment rights (because he wanted to use the evidence to intimidate witnesses and try the case in the court of public opinion). Now he wants it all under seal because there’s an election coming. Judge Chutkan replied that “defendent’s concern with the political consequences of these proceedings does not bear on the pre-trial schedule - what needs to happen before or shouldn’t happen before the election is not relevant.”

So, because she ruled on Trump’s behalf in this case back in August, same rules apply now. She ruled against Jack Smith’s ask to seal everything - he wanted ALL info redacted in his original request.

So, again I will say, you don’t get it both ways Diaper Don!

I got this information from former FBI Deputy Director Andy McCabe and Dr. Allison Gill on the Jack podcast, Episode 96.

Actually, here’s the awesome and ironic part - Jack Smith wanted this to all be under seal, Judge Chutkan disagreed and took Donald’s older request to have the previous filings only redacted for sensitive info, like witness names, and had the rest be publicly available.

Of course now Donald didn’t want this one to be public, lol. Can’t have it both ways, Diaper Don.