Noxy

Why do you say that?

Good thing this is a completely optional “feature” that I’d never pay for

You first, shithead

not quite as good as the OK Corral in Morse Code but I’ll take it

The walking plastic surgery malpractice lawsuit is right about something for once

VR has actual staying power though. It genuinely adds a lot to a game or a simulation. VRchat especially is like a deeply emotional thing to folks who don’t feel like they belong in their real bodies and can exist in VR a more true representation of themself

two demons talking about demons, got it

Aside from my concerns about the kind of shit libertarians think counts as free speech, how the hell would Microsoft implement a ban on a Minecraft server that Microsoft doesn’t host?

Like I assume it’s just connecting to the server by hostname or IP. What are they gonna do, hardcode the server’s known IPs and hostnames and prevent connections??

Username checks out

I agree completely, but what does any of this have to do with the second amendment?

I don’t see anyone better for the job.

Certainly not that transphobic piece of shit from California, that’s for damn sure.

Way above my pay grade! I would never suggest or support making such agreements, but I also don’t want to be in a position where I’d even be asked, so I’d just sit back with a bowl of popcorn

AWS aggressively pursues high priced and years-long spending commitments with large customers, and they incentivize it with huge discounts for doing so.

And when AWS does this they intentionally incentivize these large customers to migrate existing workloads away from other cloud service providers as well, going so far as to offer assistance in doing so.

I’ve been holding on to a bunch of those exact stickers for awhile now. Hope I can start slapping them up places soon!

It’s been a hot minute since a headline made me say “whoa” out loud

Personal chats cannot be in a lot of cases. Like on desktop, except for macOS for some stupid fucking reason.

Pretty telling that the headline is that they want to do something, rather than they did something.

so then all the value it brings is the exact same thing search engines have already been doing for decades.

so then all the value it brings is the exact same thing search engines have already been doing for decades.

how does one even know and verify what an LLM’s “sources” are? wouldn’t it just vomit out whatever response and then find “sources” that happen to match its stupid output after the fact?