That’s some major logical fallacy stuff that you’ve got spinning in your head over there. It’s also not the first time I’ve seen you make conclusions based off logical fallacies too. Please, please, please, do yourself a favor and do some studying on logical fallacies and public speaking. It’ll do you wonders on effectively communicating and reducing your negative outcomes.

And for the record.

I believe in the idea of third parties. I will vote for serious third party candidates that have done the real work of getting out there and recognized for their platform and constituents in down ballot elections (as long as those platforms align with me). However, I am not going to vote for any current third party in a presidential election since barely any of them have done the down ballot work to make them even possible from being serious presidential candidates. So I will vote for harm reduction, because my life & lifestyle doesn’t have the benefit of surviving another Trump presidency.

Lastly.

Not everything is about you. Somehow you made this post that was unrelated to you or third parties about you and your third party interests. I hope you can see how that could annoy people in this community and make you come off as disengenous with ulterior motives at worst or unstable and self-absorbed at best.

Aren’t they Ex-Emoloyees? Oh shit, sorry, they meant Twitter employees. My bad.

Yes, and it depends on the article, source, title, and body context how that article goes.

But how does any of that have anything to to do with this article?

How did you even come to this bad of a conclusion?

Vance was too young to be VP in 2016 thankfully.

Maybe having legal representation on your campaign that does all the legal work like this is incredibly important instead of relying on an unaffiliated clerk? I expect any candidate I would vote for to be able to navigate electoral process effectively by having a competent team. This is the inverview process, and they’re failing at it.

And no, the parties didn’t set these rules up. These rules were set up by each state, and each state varies on the rules and requirements.

Seriously. I’ve been hearing early warning alrms about Project 2025 from media articles for at leat 6+ months now. Same with the election poll rigging shit that I’ve been seeing “MSM isn’t telling you about this MAGA poll rigging!”

Maybe it’s because I pay attention? Nah, that can’t be it, I have ADHD.

In reality, it’s because there’s a ton of shit going on and in various stages of completion. Shit that’s dire/urgent today gets fed to the top of reporting with the stuff that sucks but doesn’t have impact now gets depruotized for later.

Too bad we all don’t have a Julie around.

Working all day for a mean little man With a clip-on tie and a rub-on tan He’s got me runnin’ around the office like a dog around a track But when I get back home, you’re always there to rub my back

Hey, Julie, look what they’re doing to me Tryna trip me up, tryna wear me down Julie, I swear it’s so hard to bear it And I’d never make it through without you around No, I’d never make it through without you around

Hey Julie - Fountains of Wayne

What a weirdo.

Didn’t this pastor get the memo, witches and Wicca are cool now.

Watching Tim Walz get the news in the middle of a live post debate interview that Taylor Swift was endorsing Kamala & him was amazing.

His reaction is so genuine and joyfull. You can tell he’s on the verge of happy tears.

Since I know Tim Walz doesn’t drink, I’ll just invite him over for a friend’s & family cookout instead and feed him too much carne asada.

Link to mentioned video of him getting the news: https://www.msnbc.com/all-in/watch/taylor-swift-endorses-kamala-harris-see-tim-walz-react-live-219048005739

Each state would have to decide for themselves how it works.

And yes, candidates win all the time due to their opposition dropping out, dying, etc etc. But TMK, has never happened with a presidential election.

This seems like a brilliant feature to roll out as they’re getting investigated by the DOJ for being a monopoly.

Americans, the last Trump presidency was a fucking disaster on so many fronts that ended with a massive pandemic that the management of was sabatagoted by Trump as president while also championing an insurrection.

How the fuck is anybody undecided at this point? You have to have had your head in a hole for the last 8 years to be undecided today.

Lol.

Trump campaign floundering so hard that an assisnation attempt of a former President couldn’t dominate the news cycle and they’re trying to make it happen 2 months later.

Not gonna happen weirdos.

Have we tried foreplay?

Aka, the Nickleback joke ruiner.

Don’t under estimate the tribes from showing up and swinging AZ blue again.

Nickleback would probabaly be happy they’re getting played again.

80s?

Southern Washington and the majority of Oregon were hot spots for white supremacist “utopia” migration dating back to before the Civil Rights movement.

As a white dude, it’s fucking scary visiting some of those small towns in both states. My wife will even suggest not going to areas due research she’s done to verify that were not stepping into a social trap.

CNN changed ownership a while back and it’s had a clear impact on their bias and reporting standards. Giving a voice to the “far right” was a final straw of my “trust but verify” stance I had with them before that change.

Obviously I don’t trust Fox, OAN (do they still exist?), InfoWars or any of the similar ilk at all. Thats not to say that I write off everything right wing, but there isnt many that pass muster in the US ATM.

There’s also a handful of “left” publications that I dismiss offhand due to a history of sensationalism and bad perspectives.

The majority of news is a “trust but verify” stance with me (using a secondary media outlet). It’s not a straight “this news source is credible” stance, but whether or not they have a history of news that is overtly biased, sensationalized, or mis-reporting. And then there’s the individual article itself.