Either they federate and all their users are exposed to the rest of the fediverse, or they don’t and they may as well be a separate thing
Either they federate and all their users are exposed to the rest of the fediverse, or they don’t and they may as well be a separate thing
I was keeping in mind that they put that much money in, surely all that money has made something playable that would make some money, whereas throwing it all away makes nothing at all, right?
“Certain aspects of Concord were exceptional,” Hulst continued, “but others did not land with enough players, and as a result we took the game offline. We have spent considerable time these past few months exploring all our options [and] after much thought, we have determined the best path forward is to permanently sunset the game and close the studio.”
But why? Did they actually think it was going to cost more money to keep the servers running than it would bring in? What’s the opposite of the sunk cost fallacy?
multiple human hands
It wasn’t weird until you specified human
Faced with the return of one of humanity’s greatest threats, you have no choice but to head to THE TENTH CIRCLE OF HELL:
🇬🇧 THE UNITED KINGDOM OF 🇬🇧 GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND
I think we should put this on the tourist brochures
Hey beehaw, I’ve got the hottest off-the-press rumour for you today: I predict video game companies will continue to produce video games for the foreseeable future! Unbelievable, I know, but my insider knowledge tells me that companies often seek profit by providing goods and services.
or fuck with your phone volume turned on
At least they turn up the volume so you don’t have to hear them fuck
There’s also !patientgamers@sh.itjust.works and !retrogaming@lemmy.world which are relevant too
Yep, that’s what everyone realises after getting stomped a few times!
Into the Breach too, it’s just a less brutal way to learn how to play
I remember having some really solid runs, easily beating every enemy I encountered… and then not even being able to make a dent on the final boss
If by always you mean the last 15-20 years, plenty more warring from the likes of Nintendo and Sega before then!
I think the problem is that people use “algorithm” to mean “curated social media feed”, whereas it actually refers to a kick-ass prog-metal band
I think the hard part would be keeping it up to date as instances change
As others have said, the best answer is “whenever you want”, though obviously sometimes you don’t know when that is! If you need a little more structure you can see what the game presents to you as all the things you can do, for instance by completing all the achievements. Remember that sometimes the final achievements are ludicrously difficult, so if you’re not enjoying it just call it a day!
“Wobbledogs” definitely has more of a Swumble’s Big Jumble energy though
Blimey, and they say IGN only does 9/10 reviews nowadays! Fascinating article, very keen to hear if it develops any further.
What was this guy’s motivation? Playing the long game to get rich selling his kick-started ventures? Just for the glory of everyone telling him how great he is? Real altruism in a really weird way? Did he actually help improve accessibility enough in games for the ends to justify the means?
I don’t remember 4 being that chill, when you press the frog button and have to leg it back to the start for fear of losing your loot it gets pretty intense!
I guess that’s what instances are trying to avoid by preemptively blocking Threads. If everyone else blocks it then Lemmy carries on existing as it is. And I can’t imagine big corpo wouldn’t want to create their own name.