Make homelessness illegal, but don’t worry! You can just buy a house and then you’ll be home! That’s why people are homeless, right? Because they just refuse to buy homes? Fuck, I wish CA would get a governor that’s not transparently gunning to be president someday. Maybe we’d get actual help and not virtue signaling horseshit like this.
Well boo-friggin-hoo! Nobody’s holding a gun to his head and forcing him to run. His legal problems are 100% his own damn fault, and he’s putting the whole country up for sale to the highest bidder in order to evade restitution. I eagerly await the day when I never have to hear about this blowhard moron ever again.
That wasn’t witchcraft! What she did was Headology, plain and simple. Far more efficient. All you have to do is make the recipient understand that the lies they tell themselves in the dark corners of their mind are flimsy untruths that everyone can see through.
She played his ass like neon orange ten cent kazoo. With a giant button on top labeled “Insecurity Complex”. Little wonder that he’s chickening out of further debates now. Though, I expect he’ll make a lot of noise about doing a debate on Fox. Or Newsmax. Or maybe on RT, live from Moscow.
Sucks to suck Donnie.
THEY’RE EATING THE DOGS
The first time the moderators countered his obvious dog-whistle lies I was absolutely blown away. You could have knocked me over with a feather. Then I started laughing and didn’t stop.
The correction was really well done and completely natural by both moderators, I almost didn’t register what happened. Love to see it.
41 points as of right now, so I guess so? Though I wouldn’t term them bonus points. It was more meant as a preemptory commiseration and to mock the cohort of bootlickers-of-billionaires that pop in from time to time.
Bold of you to assume that anyone who is in the position of being asked these kind of questions will provide any sort of comprehensible answer. Why the fuck would a Kennedy need to sell drugs? I thought they were rich, which is why we’re all forced to listen to this gravelly, ridden-by-brain-worms-then-put-away-wet windbag in the first place.
In before someone making 35k a year says this is unfair or discriminatory.
IMO this sounds like a step in the right direction. Anything to shift the tax burden onto the wealthy should be on the table.
aw c’mon bro just one more golf course
just one more bro c’mon bro i swear
bro i told these land developers you were cool bro please help me out c’mon
endangered what? animals? pff bro the dollars in my wallet are endangered of running out dude seriously fresh out of fucks n bucks over here
Not*
Would have been cool, but the whole night was cool anyway!
Republicans and ratfucking peace talks during an inhumane war of territorial expansion to make their political opponent look bad. Name a more iconic duo.
We built this kitty
We built this kitty a scratching post
Comrade Jill Stein? Спасибо, but no Спасибо.
This attitude of clapping back at the absolutely insane actions of the Republicans has made me feel represented for the first time in my life. It’s also making me happy that I’m excited to vote for a candidate rather than just voting against the worst option for a slightly-less-worse option. Love to see that.
I mean. That’s what I was saying? I’m not in favor of book bans, I’m in favor of parents being aware of the content their kids are consuming. If you as a parent want your kids to read ACOTAR, then that’s your call. I’m not in favor of book bans or the government telling you what you can or can’t read. Not sure where all this hostility is coming from.
Bit of a leap there, but hey, if you’ve got kids and you want them to read those books then I don’t think anyone should be able to stop you. Your kid, your choice.
My only point is that I’d want to make sure my kid, if I had one, was able to understand the themes in the book before reading.
I was also making a point about other books with more violent or pornographic content not being on this reactionary banned book list, but everyone seems to have overlooked that. Oh well.
I did say that high school is where I could see this book being read. It may even be beneficial to read them in order to learn about abusive relationships.
I’m not for banning books by any measure. I also don’t have kids, so I don’t really have a dog in this fight.
However, I’ve read all the Court of Thorns and Roses series and it does contain some pretty explicit sexual scenes and themes. I probably wouldn’t want a child reading them until they were old enough to understand the use of sex in stories like this, and how you can tell the difference between healthy and unhealthy relationships. The books in my opinion are very fun reads, but I feel that they were written primarily for an adult audience.
No idea when a kid should start reading ACOTAR, as again I don’t have kids. I’m not the right person to ask, but I’d argue that readers should be at least high school age for that series.
I haven’t read any of the other books on that list, so I can’t speak to those. It’s very evident that whoever assembled that list isn’t well read, because there’s oodles more books with much worse content than ACOTAR that aren’t banned. Off the top from books I read back in high school: American Psycho, Clockwork Orange, Blood Meridian, the list goes on…
I’ll take a shot at this if you first explain what commonalities you see between this guy and Harris. I’m interested to see why you think they’re at all similar.