- 33 Posts
- 27 Comments
5·7 days agoOff course, but it makes sense to ask that question in the headline regarding Mrs. Hannah-Jones’ research.
Trump’s suit was filed in U.S. District Court in Amarillo, Texas, effectively guaranteeing that it would be assigned to Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, a Trump nominee with a conservative judicial record.
Elon Musk changes X terms to steer lawsuits to his favorite Texas court
I don’t know how you meant your comment. Do you criticise the article?
…Or was it because “The Apprentice” twice lost the Emmy for outstanding reality competition program? In an eerie bit of foreshadowing of his political career, he called the awards show “rigged,” “a con game,” and “an irrelevant show” with “no credibility.”
😅
“Democracy died in broad daylight”
5·12 days agoSpace Marine 2 Is Too Busy Making You Feel Heroic to Show the Farce at Warhammer 40K’s Heart
I’ve long enjoyed Warhammer 40K, but so often the people who write fiction for the setting struggle to handle the black satire that sits at the heart of the setting.
The problem is there’s a non-insignificant sexist, racist, and toxic portion of the Warhammer fanbase that tend to think the Imperium is correct in its methods. Newcomers might play it and not understand what the setting is truly about.
I liked playing SM2, but they should do more against the racists fanbase.
deleted by creator
112·1 month agoThere are not even any plurals – if you really need to stress the plural form, then you just repeat the word again.
deleted by creator
Where is that? I think women often don’t walk around topless because men sexualize them or take photos, etc.
If they allow it for men they might have to allow it for everybody.
Thats a more plausible explanation than what the big religions offer.
Trump’s statements certainly weren’t enforceable under contract law, said Robert Bartlett III, a professor of law and business at Stanford Law School. The former president’s press conference remarks weren’t accompanied by the formalities that made the lockup agreement binding.
But securities law might have something to say if Trump didn’t mean it when he said he had “no intention of selling.” That would make it a misstatement, under securities fraud laws, said Bartlett. And given how much Trump Media stock moved after the Sept. 14 press conference, a plaintiff could argue that the misstatement was “material.”
A sale by Trump on Friday would be an easy case, said Adam Pritchard, a University of Michigan law professor who’s written extensively on securities regulation.
‘If he sold today, that would be fraud,” said Pritchard on Friday. “The chance of lawsuit would be exceedingly high and even the SEC might decide it was worth a lawsuit.”
But Trump didn’t say he intended to hold his stock forever. If Trump starts selling stock some weeks from now, it becomes harder to argue that his statement was false, said Pritchard.
https://www.marketwatch.com/articles/trump-djt-stock-sell-lockup-d4b275bf?mod=mw_quote_news
Est. remaining 1,854,000