Also it wasn’t a toss up. Trump won every single swing state. All of them. This article is some mad copium. Prepare to see more of it over the next few days.

Unfair. She could sober up before doing that. Which she won’t do while in office or on the campaign.

When did he say they were inefficient in their messaging?

This is why pirating is justified. If you want your shows to last forever, torrent them, and keep them seeded.

Kamala should do a long interview with Fox, and Trump should do a long interview with MSNBC. It’s what would be good for the American people.

Is one of them Israel and other foreign governments? Also Pfizer?

Then for one day for no reason at all the cyber trucks rose up and…

I think that cuck’s name is Whistlin Diesel.

It sounds like everyone but mods should be able to see voters. But of course they will use straw accounts. What if only votes on your own post/comment were revealed to you? Like some pointed out, they are already not anonymous to anyone who wants to try hard enough to get the data because of federation. So the question is who do we want to be able to see that data easily? It’s a GUI modification in any case. Who are we making the gui modification for?

Then I’m super for it. Might as well make what is available to a few try hards available to all easily.

For this user base it is the right answer. So many petty downvoters. On my site I’m considering a rule that would make it so you can’t be the vote that casts a comment into the negative without giving a reason, and then that reason would be turned into a comment. If something is worth downvoting then it is worth explaining why someone is wrong. If you can’t do that maybe you shouldn’t downvote. I don’t think you should have to do that every time. But if a comment is going to go negative someone should step up to the plate and bother to articulate. That way a comment can’t get hidden away from the public just because a petty mob that can’t even present an argument sees it as convenient if certain information disappears.

So in that case the downvoter who crossed it into the negative would not be anonymous.

I saw an attempt: https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost?postid=66b48351b0c7a

That’s going to get sold on the internet.

That and the fact that genocide is infinitely more evil than terrorism. Terrorism isn’t good, but genocide can never be the response to terrorism. Because terrorism will always exist, and genocide never can. If genocide was an acceptable response to terrorism then there would be genocide every day, rather than never.

Geographically, the US.

This logic breaks down when you realize the laptop is mine, and not HP’s or Windows. And any software that is mine, my copy of windows should also be mine and not microsoft’s, can modify my device if I have selected some of my software to do that.

If you don’t use HP and you don’t use windows you won’t have the problem. You should be boycotting HP as a part of BDS anyway. https://bdsmovement.net/boycott-hp

“But I already bought an HP.” If you had adopted BDS much earlier like you should have you wouldn’t have these problems.

They use dark patterns and cryptic dialog boxes to get old people to opt in.

Weren’t you all just hating on Republicans for not voting for that bill.

How about an all bills must be fucking separate bill?