• Trihilis@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    The post itself is reasonable quality and informative so I find it upvote worthy. If a post is low quality or a shit post then I downvote.

    To me the karma system is about quality. Not an “I agree/disagree” button.

    For comments I only down vote obvious trolls, bigots/racism etc.

    • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      To me the karma system is about quality. Not an “I agree/disagree” button.

      That’s how it was meant to be. The original Rediquette from over 15 years ago has:

      “Vote. If you think something contributes to conversation, upvote it. If you think it does not contribute to the subreddit it is posted in or is off-topic in a particular community, downvote it.
      [Please don’t] Downvote an otherwise acceptable post because you don’t personally like it. Think before you downvote and take a moment to ensure you’re downvoting someone because they are not contributing to the community dialogue or discussion. If you simply take a moment to stop, think and examine your reasons for downvoting, rather than doing so out of an emotional reaction, you will ensure that your downvotes are given for good reasons.
      ”

      But 99% of people definitely use them as an Agree/Disagree button.

    • onnekas@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, one could argue if just posting a link with a title is a ‘quality’ post. But the topic is still worth a discussion so I don’t see why it should be downvoted.

    • macaw_dean_settle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem is that people routinely upvote bullshit, falsehoods, and flat out disinformation. Just because it was well written does not make it true.