• SulaymanF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Apple requires some developer credentials and notarization for sideloading apps, to prevent known malware. What is the problem with this?

    Edit: everyone this is an honest question.

    • Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      People use Android to not have such restrictions.

      Something like F-Droid (which published its own builds from source) would likely not be possible with such a model.

    • trolololol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      First, we don’t have this in Android and we’re better off.

      It’s another flavour of gatekeeping.

      Second, why do we want to copy apple?

      • Cabslock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Another honest question:

        Why wouldn’t the EU force Android to allow sideloading apps just as they’ve done with apple?

        • jim3692@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          We just hope they do force Android to allow sideloading. However, I wouldn’t expect them to do so, given their latest decisions…

    • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Do you think Google won’t revoke the signature for apps like revanced or newpipe or send a c&d to the now doxxed devs?

      Main reason apple did that is to limit piracy, nsfw apps and track how many installs so they can still bill the developer for that