jeffw@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 months agoWhy does “weird” work? Republicans love to appeal to a supposed silent majority. The new insult helps intervene.www.motherjones.comexternal-linkmessage-square83fedilinkarrow-up1531arrow-down18
arrow-up1523arrow-down1external-linkWhy does “weird” work? Republicans love to appeal to a supposed silent majority. The new insult helps intervene.www.motherjones.comjeffw@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square83fedilink
minus-squarelobut@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·edit-22 months agoI’m not sure I agree with the analysis, I think Vaush said it best. https://youtube.com/shorts/mDS9bv8Sj7I I want to TLDR it but I can’t because I’m too drunk and all my attempts have failed. Watch the clip if you can/want.
minus-squareNoSpotOfGround@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up37·edit-22 months agoTL;DR: “No 14 year old boy will stop following someone if they’re considered evil and bad, but they will stop if they’re considered cringe”.
minus-square【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoThis is why I support the movement among women of not fucking Republican voters, as a policy.
minus-squarekamenLady.@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoYou surely mean they won’t stop following someone if they’re considered evil and bad.
minus-squareNoSpotOfGround@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoYes, that’s right. There’s a “no” at the beginning of the phrase which gives it that meaning (I misread it myself, so I see where you’re coming from).
minus-squarekamenLady.@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 months agoNow i see it, i somehow managed to ignore the “No”
minus-squareMindTraveller@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoGoogle is going to track whoever clicks that link thanks to your SI
minus-squarelobut@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-22 months agoThanks! I sometimes remove that (forgot this time) but never knew what that was.
minus-squareMindTraveller@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 months agoIt’s your personal identifying code. When someone clicks a link with it, Google knows they got the link from you. They want to know who you’re talking to on other platforms for their data models.
I’m not sure I agree with the analysis, I think Vaush said it best.
https://youtube.com/shorts/mDS9bv8Sj7I
I want to TLDR it but I can’t because I’m too drunk and all my attempts have failed. Watch the clip if you can/want.
TL;DR: “No 14 year old boy will stop following someone if they’re considered evil and bad, but they will stop if they’re considered cringe”.
This is why I support the movement among women of not fucking Republican voters, as a policy.
You surely mean they won’t stop following someone if they’re considered evil and bad.
Yes, that’s right. There’s a “no” at the beginning of the phrase which gives it that meaning (I misread it myself, so I see where you’re coming from).
Now i see it, i somehow managed to ignore the “No”
Google is going to track whoever clicks that link thanks to your SI
Thanks! I sometimes remove that (forgot this time) but never knew what that was.
It’s your personal identifying code. When someone clicks a link with it, Google knows they got the link from you. They want to know who you’re talking to on other platforms for their data models.