Besides that, it’s definitely an overreaching document. I expect it to get a failing grade at ToS;DR.
Edit: found the part for VPNs listed under the “prohibited uses” (emphasis my own):
use IP proxying or other methods to disguise the location of your use or Device, whether to circumvent geographical restrictions on the use of the Game, the Documentation or Services or for any other purpose or in a way that violates these Terms;
What’s funny is that the EU has already ruled the EULAs are not legally enforceable. So that custom EU version is irrelevant and they may as well have not bothered.
Shouldn’t there be a Steam EULA or something that overwrites BS like this? I don’t know. I’m genuinely curious if that holds up. If developers really can terminate your license willy-nilly and damage Valve’s reputation by doing so. Because it would sound like a PR nightmare for the store front too.
–" Their EULA specifically calls out the following behavior and actions as not allowed and will result in the termination of your license:
They also mention that they:
Might want to read the eula for the game, otherwise you might lose access to it.
Shitty draconinan and unforceable EULA, that’s a hard pass for me. Any company that does shit like that don’t deserve to see my money.
Link to the terms of service here: https://subnautica.com/en/policy/tos
I didn’t see anything about VPNs.
Besides that, it’s definitely an overreaching document. I expect it to get a failing grade at ToS;DR.
Edit: found the part for VPNs listed under the “prohibited uses” (emphasis my own):
What’s funny is that the EU has already ruled the EULAs are not legally enforceable. So that custom EU version is irrelevant and they may as well have not bothered.
Any source on that? As a european i am very interested on reading up on this!
Shouldn’t there be a Steam EULA or something that overwrites BS like this? I don’t know. I’m genuinely curious if that holds up. If developers really can terminate your license willy-nilly and damage Valve’s reputation by doing so. Because it would sound like a PR nightmare for the store front too.
Wouldn’t they lose access to their own rights by causing a scandal that tarnishes Kraftons reputation?
why would they include themselves in it when they can make onesided demands?
They are not end users. So the End User License Agreement wouldn’t apply