• eestileib@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    He’s not wrong, the two main parties absolutely do collude to create a duopoly.

    He’s also the wrong messenger to deliver the message.

    • ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      The two main parties are so big that they don’t need to collude. Every single component of our media will do the work for them.

      • snooggums@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Colluding involves communication and coordinated ation. They don’t need to collude because excluding third parties is in their best interest.

        Both parties are still wary after the outcome in 1992 when Ross Perot received nearly 20% of the vote after being included in the debates. Neither want to risk having a wildcard on stage.

        • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Neither want to risk having a wildcard on stage

          Well thats really none of their business so long as this is a democracy. What they want is irrelevant.

          He’s polling high enough. He should be included.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      It’s not just that.

      Every other election debates are held by a nonpartisan organization and a third party that meets certain requirements can also join.

      Because political parties are private organizations not attached to the government.

      This election both parties agreed they will only do debates that they arrange.

      Meaning they’re in charge of who shows up, and they’ll never both agree to let anyone else join.

      People keep acting like it doesn’t matter, but it’s a big deal.

      Edit:

      Obviously RFK is a joke and won’t win, but we shouldn’t just shrug as the two private parties seize more and more power when they have zero accountability to voters and neither side will ever be held accountable by their own politicians.

      • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        The lower one side goes, the lower the other side goes. How are you gonna vote out fascism when the Democrats go a low as they can simply because Republicans go lower. Trump doesn’t even need to win at this point for fascism to continue encroaching because Dems will continue to strip liberties like fair debates away under the guise of stopping the other sides fascism. Every day we march rightward.

  • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    That’s just the worm talking Bobby. In reality, no one respects you or sees you as a real candidate.

    • NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      There are a few RFK signs by houses in a rural area by me. They used to have Trump signs though, so I think it’s a wash.