• Pacattack57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    We need to find a way to make settlements in exchange for silence illegal. That is not justice.

  • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Hush money.

    These are the people who use “protect kids” as a slogan to excuse spying on everyone (for data they can sell to advertisers, no less).

    These are the people whom kids need to be protected from.

  • Jazzy Vidalia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Abolish their charters. Prosecute every person involved under RICO. Nationalize their company assets. Regulate the industry.

    It’s vulgar what the corporate world inflicts on us all and it must come to an end. These traitors against humanity need to be held accountable.

    • justsomeguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The teen plaintiffs accused the companies of causing their depression, self-harm, eating disorders, and anxiety. According to the publication’s insider sources, Meta paid just two teens a combined $7 million to keep them quiet — a startling revelation that highlights how far these companies are willing to keep a highly sensitive subject out of the headlines.

      They go on those platforms and get pushed down rabbit holes like anorexia glorifying content and before they know it their mental health is in the kind of state that a decade of therapy can’t fix.

      The platforms pay off the very few that sue while millions of others quietly suffer. Most of them not having the resources to take them to court anyway.

    • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The teen plaintiffs accused the companies of causing their depression, self-harm, eating disorders, and anxiety.

  • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The fact that they’re willing to pay teenagers to keep quiet says a lot. If the apps were really as safe as they claim, you’d think they’d want to prove it in court rather than settle quietly. Hard to take all those speeches about protecting kids seriously after that.

  • TheOriginalMattman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    These teens should offer to bring a case, breaking the NDAs in exchange for protection for doing so.

    Or just collectively break the NDAs because it would shame the social media companies into at least not pursuing them.

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          56 minutes ago

          Probably. These were civil suits though. You can’t settle a criminal case.

      • MIDItheKID@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        If justice was real, there would be a way for them to break NDA, and keep the money, because fuck these companies. They need to be taught a lesson: “Fuck around and find out”

    • Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      it’s not like these companies care about laws anyways, so it only stands to reason they don’t care about NDA’s either