Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 month agoOpinion: Harris’s agenda mirrors the Democratic Socialists of Americawww.msn.comexternal-linkmessage-square233fedilinkarrow-up119arrow-down174
arrow-up1-55arrow-down1external-linkOpinion: Harris’s agenda mirrors the Democratic Socialists of Americawww.msn.comSocialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square233fedilink
minus-squarePeggyLouBaldwin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·1 month ago1, voting is not harm reduction, and 2, that video has given you a false conclusion. the lesson we should learn is that strategic voting leads to party consolidation, and the only way to keep third parties is to continue to vote for them.
minus-squarepooperNickel@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·29 days ago Yes absolutely it is 2. I remember this account and it makes total sense you’re campaigning for Jill fucking Stein. Jesus Christ 🤮
minus-squarePeggyLouBaldwin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·29 days agoharm reduction is a specific thing. voting is not harm reduction.
minus-squarepooperNickel@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·29 days agoUnless you care about truth in which case it absolutely is harm reduction
minus-squarePeggyLouBaldwin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·29 days agoharm reduction has a specific definition. voting is not harm reduction.
minus-squarepooperNickel@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·29 days agoNot really interested in your pedantry that probably isn’t even technically correct (not that it matters)
minus-squarePeggyLouBaldwin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·29 days agohttps://www.indigenousaction.org/voting-is-not-harm-reduction-an-indigenous-perspective/
minus-squarepooperNickel@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·29 days agoThe url itself says it’s talking about a specific context that has nothing to do with this.
minus-squarePeggyLouBaldwin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·29 days agoI can’t make you read
1, voting is not harm reduction, and 2, that video has given you a false conclusion. the lesson we should learn is that strategic voting leads to party consolidation, and the only way to keep third parties is to continue to vote for them.
harm reduction is a specific thing. voting is not harm reduction.
Unless you care about truth in which case it absolutely is harm reduction
harm reduction has a specific definition. voting is not harm reduction.
Not really interested in your pedantry that probably isn’t even technically correct (not that it matters)
https://www.indigenousaction.org/voting-is-not-harm-reduction-an-indigenous-perspective/
The url itself says it’s talking about a specific context that has nothing to do with this.
I can’t make you read