• sorrybookbroke@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    OK. That’s a wild thing to say. If you’re willing to say that the red states may illegally fail to hold elections can you not recognize the likelyhood that they’d stop, by force, blue states from doing the same?

    Do you seriously think blue states wouldn’t fold if pressured to stop elections?

    I’m not convinced that any of this will come to pass and elections will be stopped but if they want to they can and will.

    • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      That requires much more than just red states republican legislatures being complicit. That’s just a straight up military coup at that point. That’s not the scenario the earlier people were laying out

      We’ve had hybrid senarios before. During Lincoln’s elections, many southern states didn’t even let him put his name on the ballot. He still won the election

      • sorrybookbroke@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        Not really if it’s threatened and the dems instantly fold. A dozen or so congress members and few senate members in support of freezing elections, the threat of violence, and a continuation of what see we now. That’s about all that’s needed.

        Still, though it’d argue it unlikely, military intervention cannot be ruled out

        On this being a separate situation it’s not really. It’s just an expansion of your own hypothetical. In a world where red states halt elections they would also pressure blue states to do the same. Blue states would likely fold as they have to many of the more important issues recently.

        • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Don’t conflate national dems and state dem parties. The state dems are fighting back far stronger

          Hell many are defying trump straight to his face such as Maine’s governor who told him in person that they’d not comply with his anti-trans stuff

          Kathy Hochul is still enforcing NYC’s congestion pricing despite Trump directly telling her to stop and threatning federal funding

          And so on

          • sorrybookbroke@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            I guess there’s not much to this argument at this point between us. I hope you’re right, and I would assume some resistance, but do doubt it to be significant. The courts are captured, national dems are weak, and even when talking about the power of state dems I’ve not seen much strong and resilient push back. Lastly, national dems have quite a bit of power in state politics. Don’t doubt the ability of a crab to pull down it’s fellow crab in it’s own attempt to leave the bucket.

            Thanks for the conversation. Though I’m a bit more pessimistic I can see you’re atleast a reasonable person