cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/57182784

cross-posted from : https://lemmy.zip/post/57182782

Carney told reporters on Friday that “the world has changed” in recent years, and the progress made with China sets Canada up “well for the new world order”.

Canada’s relationship with China, he added, had become “more predictable” than its relationship with the US under the Trump administration.

      • Maeve@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Brazil, China, Egypt, Ethiopia, India, Indonesia, Iran, Russian Federation, South Africa, United Arab Emirates. But India and Brazil want the economic benefits without participating in security drills.

        • shawn1122@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          Neither India nor Brazil want BRICS to become a Global South equivalent to NATO and instead see it as a forum for economic cooperation so their actions match their intentions.

          The lead nation was China with Russia and Iran also participating in the most recent military exercise. Brazil likely would not want to participate given their proximity to the US and India is already part of other security partnerships (Quad).

          • Maeve@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I understand, it’s a delicate situation; I hope Brazil is taking some sort of security preparation because of their proximity to the United States.

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Brazil and India are among the founders of BRICS They are the B and I of the acronym.
          The cooperation is economic and has no defense aspect AFAIK. So what BRICS related security drills would that be?

            • Buffalox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              But when Brazil and India aren’t in that, it’s per definition not BRICS, the article state the exercise is by 3 BRICS members, but it is not BRICS. BRICS is way bigger now than the original 5 members.
              Calling this a BRICS exercise is exclusively something that exist in the head of the author of the article, and there is absolutely zero reference to any BRICS defense pact.
              Even if China, Russia, and South Africa make a defense pact, it is per definition not BRICS without including Brazil and India.

              • Maeve@kbin.earth
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                I don’t agree. We still call NATO NATO, although I believe it’s effectively toast.

                • Buffalox@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Because formally NATO is still NATO.
                  China, Russia, and South Africa are not BRICS and nothing in the article you linked indicated the exercise had anything to do with the BRICS cooperation that is 100% economic.

    • MBech@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      9 months ago

      Isolationism isn’t the solution. The world needs to be better at working together, not splitting apart.

      • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        We can have both a local manufacturing sector and imports.

        The last few years have shown us that we need to produce stuff here because the supply chain can explode and were caught with our pants down.

        • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          There’s no reason Canada can’t make its own cars. Or computer chips.

          Sure if you’re talking at least a 10x on the price of equivalent consumer goods, which isn’t going to drive prices down whatsoever. China both subsidises manufacturing AND devalues their currency to keep manufacturing costs low and exports high. There’s no way to do that in the Canadian economy or any single western economy without either tanking it (huge deflation) or saddling the country with so much debt to invest into the industries and then subsidise long enough to be cost competitive that it would never be able to make the credit repayments.

            • evol@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              You can get Chinese prices if your citizens are willing to work like the Chinese, no one in the West will.

              Autarky is also largely a degrowth argument, most Westerners already feel like they should consume even more so it’s impossible to win unless your voters fall for Donald Trump esque arguments. The modern Westerner lives one of the most opulent lives in the world history on the back of cheap third world labor.

              edit: If you believe the Trump admin has a plan, they are trying to thread needle by devaluing the US Dollar just enough to incentivize manufacturing, but keeping it high enough that the average US consumer doesn’t feel the hit. They then leverage tariffs for preferential trade deals with other countries. I don’t think its really working but its the only way you could revitalize manufacturing in the west at this point

    • Akh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      In truth, sometimes, you just cant. Why is US so hell bent on Canada and Greenland? Rare earths. Taiwan produces something like 80% of all chips made for electronics.

    • Maeve@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      I believe it’s in every state’s interest to invest in manufacturing, as well as having trade and development sharing with others, but exploititive agreements that rob another state and make it a defacto colony, or subject the people to austerity, sanctions, overly burdensome loans (imf/wto), or create dependency rather than self-sufficiency is just another form of rent-seeking and grounds for expulsion of the exploiting states, and nationalization of any industry benefitting from the exploitation (including poisoning the air, water, soil).

    • CircaV@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Canada has always been a trading nation. We have loads of raw materials, it’s been this way since before Canada was a country.

      • madcaesar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        And? Even fucking Saudi Arabia is trying to branch out.

        Canada needs to think ahead and start building infrastructure now for the future in parallel to just selling raw materials.

        • No_Eponym@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Too hard. Best offer is more resource extraction, ologopolies and housing bubbles. Final offer.

  • CircaV@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    Damn right. We are done with the US. The US is dead to us and it’s generational.

  • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Meeting back up at the reunion in 3 (to 10+ years)

    “Oh… hi Canada! You’re looking well.”

    “Gah!!.. Soree but do I… Oh, USA? Kinda snuck up on me there… It’s been a while. You uh, you look… different. Didn’t quite recognize you with your new…tear drop tattoos? Also, did you do something to your hair?”

    “Oh this? No, it kinda just happened suddenly all at once. Apparently it’s called canities subita…”