• capital@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    “Adobe does not train Firefly Gen AI models on customer content. Firefly generative AI models are trained on a dataset of licensed content, such as Adobe Stock, and public domain content where copyright has expired.”

    This references a single particular product. lol. If they’re training a model by a different name with customer data, it would still be a true statement.

    The points about lawyers and NDA’s hit the nail on the head. I thought something similar with the Windows Recall debacle. That’s a juicy set of data for anyone looking to find journalist sources or scrape a hospital’s network. In every case it relies on the end user (business or individual) to know how to disable those features with GPOs/registry options… There’s no way 100% of them realize the issue and have the knowledge to fix it.

  • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Every time we trusted a large tech promise on an unverifiable claim, they ended up shafting us. Just sayin’.

  • edwardbear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Oh, if they PROMISE.

    Fuck Adobe. I’ll pirate PS and AI until I die. Greedy fucking pigboys.

    • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      Pirating Adobe software is exactly what they want you to do. Their business model relies on businesses paying for their license because people already know how to use their software, in large part because people pirate it, and also they have deals with schools to teach their software.

      What Adobe actually doesn’t want you to do is to learn the software of their competition, since that’s how they will lose money in the long term.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Those are the easiest apps to replace. I’ll just use Gimp and Inkscape until I die. Not even tempted by Adobe’s bloat, spyware, etc.

  • cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Interesting, we get to either hate them for going full big brother, or hate them for going full adobe in the first place. It’s nice to have a choice sometimes.

  • fluckx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Here’s a License change which implies we’re datafarming all your assets.

    Here’s my word that we’re absolutely not goijf to be doing that. Trust me bro.

  • doctortofu@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Riiiight. And, pray tell Adobe, why in the everloving fuck woul you ever need to “review” private content that’s not posted anywhere? Stop acting like you’re the goddamned pre-crime agency from Minority Report and keep your dirty paws off stuff people are creating privately.

    You are providing tools, and that’s it. I can do horrible, illegal shit with my drill, but it doesn’t give Black&Decker any right to break into my house to do random checks and see if I’m drilling through kneecaps instead of wooden planks…

  • CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    But “big brother” would mean they watch you.

    I read everywhere that they claim the rights to your projects, which is far worse than just watching over your shoulder innit?

    • Eiim@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Where did you read that? I can bet it wasn’t the TOS, because that’s not in there. The TOS allows Adobe to review anything you create with its products using manual or automated means, and maybe restricted to normal screening for CSAM and such (although it’s really ambiguous about what they’ll actually do with it).

  • WallEx@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Okay, I promise the did go big brother.

    So what now, my word against theirs?

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    They just wanna review your work 😀. What if you’re trying to put a penis on Trump’s face and it’s too big or it’s pointing the wrong way or something? You know. Wouldn’t you want to be told stuff like " the police is coming unless you erase this now!" You know, things like that? It would definitely come in handy to catch kids doing nudes of others. Or adults doing nudes of other adults who didn’t know. I wouldn’t want to end up in a collage of nudes that is 20MBb 1080p or 4K.