• lepinkainen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Apple Music pays multiple times more to artists than Spotify.

    Tidal pays multiple times more than Apple.

    You can influence things with your wallet.

    • BoneALisa@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      If you can, and they have it on there, buy your favorite albums on Bandcamp, then they are yours forever

        • BoneALisa@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I dont think so? As far as I can tell, my account still works and I bought an album there the other day.

          It looks like the company has been sold around a few times in the last few years and i think its gotten worse, but I honestly cant tell lol

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Tidal pays multiple times more than Apple.

      On paper. But in practice…

      On February 27, 2016, Yesh Music, LLC and John Emanuele from the band The American Dollar launched a $5 million class-action lawsuit that claimed Tidal had to compensate the band for any of the royalty payments accrued from the streaming of the band’s 116 copyrighted songs. The suit also accused Tidal of using faulty numbers to payout artists while also having undercut these same individuals by 35%. A response from Tidal stated that they were indeed fully up to date on all royalties for the group and had removed said intellectual property from their servers.

      Hollywood accounting and pirate profiteering undercut what artists would normally be paid.

      You can influence things with your wallet.

      You can influence how you feel about your consumer habits, but capitalists are still going to capitalize.

    • NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      The bad Ai dj. The car thing they rolled back. The new logo that’s the same as the old one, but now border. The cache that causes you to hear the same ten songs multiple times in a week.

      • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        the playlist saved for offline playback that will still try to connect to the internet for like 30 seconds when you open it while actually offline. the Discover Weekly playlist that will serve you the song that you’ve marked as “not interested” over and over and over and

        • serpineslair@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          The UI that gets progressively worse with each update, ruining what was perfectly fine before. The attempts to create the audio focused equivalent of TikTok.

          • Sanctus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            The way shuffle constantly shuts itself off even when set within the settings to be the default. The shitty Smart Shuffle that adds in songs that break up my playlists terribly. The way it plays the same song again the first time you enable shuffle and hit next.

      • bean@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        The cache part pisses me off. I’m fucking paying you to stream me music. Not the same fucking shit over and over and over again.

        • doctordevice@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I really don’t get it. Users have been begging for a true random shuffle for years. It’s not a hard thing to implement.

          • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            True random shuffle would be a terrible idea. No one wants the same track showing up multiple times in a row, which would not be uncommon in true random shuffle.

            • doctordevice@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              I disagree that that’s what it means, IMO “shuffle” explicitly means each track exactly once. Pedantry aside, what I meant was a truly randomized order when you shuffle a playlist. It’s a major critique of Spotify among users and has been for a very long time.

            • Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              I think the idea is that the play order for the entire playlist is shuffled on each loop, so you play all songs in one order, then it shuffles, and you play all songs again but in a different order.

    • dinckel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      If anything, they’ve taken features away from people lately. The quality is still shit. Lossless is still nowhere to be seen. Free users are losing options too. Yet they’re making record profits, and jacking up the price

      • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        This is why they have record profits. They attack at both ends. Strip features, increase prices.

      • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Spotify actually doesn’t make that much profit, if any.

        But the record labels are major shareholders and definitely influence the pricing structure. Spotify is essentially a marketing frontend for the record industry.

          • CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            They’re reporting 1.00 billion in gross profit as of Q1 2024 so yeah, they make money. It’s kind of impossible to compare much though since they’re the only freestanding music competitor that’s popular.

            The closest comparison I can make is using Apples reported figures of making around $9.2 billion in revenue for its 93 million user base.

            Meanwhile Spotify is making around 2.63 billion in revenue for its near 3x subscriber base estimated around 240 million. So I wouldn’t say they’re not making money, but maybe you can see why they think they can squeeze a lot more. Best to just unsubscribe honestly, they’ll keep doing this

            • intensely_human@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              So they’re leaving a lot of money on the table and getting criticized for their greed? I’m not sure how that’s a coherent position.

    • Granbo's Holy Hotrod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      AI generated music based off your likes and listening. It lines up with his statements. There was no innovation here. The same as every “disruptor” technology that just cheapified everything and one it was ubiquitous attempt to remove the core of the business.

    • JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      They did add audiobooks.

      Though the interface for audiobooks sucks, so I hope they improve it.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        The last thing I ever wanted from Spotify was audiobooks or podcasts. We’ve had excellent apps available for several years already, we don’t need half assed bloat added to (very poorly) replicate the same features

        • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          The part is what drives me mad. Podcasts and audiobooks are not that hard to do properly. You could very easily separate them into distinct apps or at least a special tab that acts like a proper player. Instead audiobooks are basically albums.

          There’s a shuffle button.

          On an audiobook.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Why not use a free/cheap pocketing app designed for it specifically? All the podcast apps I’ve tried are far better than spotify. UI-wise at least.

  • Kevnyon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    For anyone out there, I recommend giving Tidal a shot and for podcasts, I recommend a FOSS app called AntennaPod. This is the combo I use myself, I’ve been using Tidal for a bit over two years now and just recently switched to AntennaPod.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      AOL profited for over a decade on people who signed up for the service and simply lost track of it, paying month after month for something they’d forgotten they even had.

      Crazy that these services can just raise premiums whenever they please without even reaffirming that the customer still wants the service. I guarantee that if you needed to re-verify your account on a price increase, firms with big client pools would never raise their rates again.

  • blazeknave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I left when I saw how much of our money they gave to Joe Rogan to punch down on trans people. Already paying for YouTube pro for years and finally took advantage of their music app. It’s been great. My car and every Google screen in the house have native support. The only disadvantage is everything from tinder to open source crap I run at home only integrate with Spotify.

  • Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Anyone have an alternative with the same content, offline play, and integration into Android Auto? I would love to switch if something meets my needs.

    • Nadaph@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      If it’s worth anything, Tidal has had great offline support so far. I’m missing a handful of tracks, but the offline support might be enough to move to Tidal. It’s either generally better quality, better offline, better shuffling, and a dollar less per month, or a console/tv app and a few more albums.

    • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      IIRC this means the family plan costs more than 3 individual plans did like 3 years ago. If not more than it saves you like $.50 in comparison. I would try and look it up but Google search has also turned to shit so I don’t feel like dealing with it.

      The Internet just isn’t fun anymore.

  • can@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    So now that Tidal has moved its Hi-Fi tier price down to match Apple’s wtf is Spotify doing? Charging more than the competition, paying artists less, and not even offering lossless?

    • Infynis@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Spotify is less vulnerable to customer churn compared to TV/movie streaming services, as users are less likely to switch music streaming providers due to the hassle of rebuilding playlists and losing personalized recommendations.

    • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Spotify has over 200mill paying subscribers and over 600mill total I believe. They an afford the peel off unfortunately.

      From what I can tell Tidal won’t even publish their subscribers so it must be pretty small.

  • moon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    The average person: Spotify sucks and is making me hate them even more

    Shareholders seeing layoffs followed by AI replacements for those workers and then repeated price hikes: 🤑

    • jorp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      The myth of capitalism is that it improves things for the consumer. It’s very obvious that it only improves, at best, the next quarter’s returns for the investor. Once that husk of a company stops “line going up,” the money goes elsewhere and we repeat.

      If the line can’t go up through creation it’ll go up through destruction.

      • aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        It worked differently before speech was considered money. Or I like to tell myself that.

        • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          It worked differently before because the information network was orders of magnitude slower and data was expensive as Pope shit.

          Nowadays, the information is almost instant and everything is interconnected and data storage is cheap so we got big data with people paid solely to boil that down to algorithms that squeeze money as much as possible from customers.

          Just look at all the streaming services that makes you pay more if you don’t want ads and they resell your data. Triple dipping baby

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        The myth of capitalism is that it improves things for the consumer

        So you don’t think your life is better than someone from the 16th century?

        • jorp@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’m so tired of this nonsense argument, is capitalism your God to which you give credit for every human accomplishment? How did capitalism help to raise the Russian serfs to the status of a world superpower? It didn’t… How did capitalism help Russia get to space before the United States? How did capitalism help human life improve before the 16th century?

          I wonder what you even think capitalism is. I wonder if you comprehend that technological advancement, markets, money, and trade aren’t synonymous with it.

          You love democracy but when it comes to matters of economic decisions you are bootlicking the petite dictators that control every aspect of your economic life. You are employed by people whose means of acquiring wealth is to skim off the top of what you’re producing and steal it from you but you are too busy making eye contact while you suck them off that you don’t see their hand in your pocket.

          The world is burning and there’s plastic in your balls because of capitalism, you are such a good submissive little peasant.