• Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    If Democrats vote more than Republicans, they will control Congress.

    Which only means we’ll get to find out who the next Manchin is.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            We had a supermajority for Lieberman. It does not matter how big a majority we give Democrats. They find the no votes. They capitulate.

            • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              The “supermajority” was a 60-40 split. That’s not a true 67/33 supermajority. It’s only filibuster-proof. It also only lasted 72 days.

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                5 months ago

                The “supermajority” was a 60-40 split.

                You think we’re gonna get more than 60 this time? If not, We’re only gonna see who the next Manchin is.

                It’s only filibuster-proof.

                Here’s where I point out once again that Democrats could have done away with the filibuster for good at any point during which they had a simple majority. If they wanted to. They don’t want to.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            if (SenateDemocrats > SenateRepublicans) {SenateDemocratsNeeded = SenateDemocrats + 1;}