The former Republican governor said that he was backing the Democrat because a Trump victory would mean ‘four more years of bullshit’
  • ViperActual@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    101·
    13 days ago

    I truly wish we had more politicians that behave in this manner. It should never boil down to my political party versus yours. There shouldn’t be any sides to governing this country.

    • LordCrom@lemmy.world
      48·
      13 days ago

      Don’t you miss the days where presidentak candidates stood up for each other … When GOP McCain defended Obama against outlandish rumors he was a secret Muslim. Seems like those days are long gone.

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        381·
        13 days ago

        That’s because none of the candidates were Russian assets.

        In this election it’s almost as if all of them are Russian assets except one.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          330·
          13 days ago

          Except RFK, right? Right? Or maybe except Bernie?

          I mean, OK, Kamala is not an asset, she’s an equal partner. Trump is an asset.

          And “Russian” should be replaced with some international network of thieves and murderers.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        5·
        12 days ago

        Like just a couple days ago when Sanders stood up for Harris about the Gaza situation?

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
        71·
        13 days ago

        Imagine if we banned parties. Made lobbying illegal and funded all of the campaigns for qualified members paid for by the government. Encouraging government figures to campaign less as it saves taxes for their constituates.

        • BigAssFan@lemmy.world
          1·
          13 days ago

          No way that government will have a majority to make this happen anytime soon. Interesting idea though.

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
            1·
            12 days ago

            If you want to hear a really dumb but interesting one. A while back I joked about a reality TV show where government figures participated and we got retired presidents/governors/advisors to go on and give situations/lectures where they collected how the participants would react in the situations, then reviewed what real life events it actually correlated to and what response(s) were actually taken, and discuss why they were good/bad ideas. Thus actually educating the up and coming members with real life scenarios and letting the public slowly learn more about the cause/effects of each members actions while also showing what decisions the members would want to take if ever elected.

            Many would lie obviously as they would lean pro populous on the show, and end up still being pro corporations when elected though, so it wouldn’t end up being so good in practice.

            …but it would be the first ever reality TV show I would want to watch. Also gives an opportunity for retired officials to make income post office so they don’t have to assume once out of office they have no hire-ability, making a bribe in office less life changing.

            Imagine hiring a president or governor at your local anything… It can’t really happen.