Yeah, both sides amiright?

  • gnuhaut@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    That excuse wouldn’t fly in a courtroom if someone helped a murderer (repeatedly and knowingly), even if they claim they gave them the weapon for self-defense. It’s proven the US govt knows what the weapons are used for, and they’ve been sending them continuously for over a year. It’s called being an accessory to the crime.

    Btw the genocide convention explicitly lists under article III e “complicity in genocide.”

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      14 days ago

      If I loan my kid a gun because he doesn’t feel safe in his house, and he later uses that gun to commit a crime, the only way I get in trouble is if he legally were not allowed to own the gun in the first place.

      To date, Israel has not been sanctioned in that manner. It’s perfectly legal to supply them.

      • gnuhaut@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        14 days ago

        You’re ignoring the fact that the US knows the weapons are used for war crimes, have been used for war crimes before, and that they’re supplying ever more weapons despite this. If you give your kid a gun and you know he’s going to murder someone, and he’s done it before multiple times, you’re going to jail.

        • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          A better analogy would be handing magazines to a mass shooter whenever he ran out of ammo