• Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    7 days ago

    Deneen proposes an “aristopopulism,” in which the virtuous elite provide order and structure to public life in order to ensure the flourishing of the ordinary citizens who cannot provide it for themselves.

    Yawn, literally did this before. They are just Pharisees. Wanna ask these dudes where Rome is now?

    • WatDabney@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 days ago

      I think we can take it as a general pribciple that anyone who considers themselves part of a “virtuous elite” and nominally fit to “provide order and structure to public life in order to ensure the flourishing of the ordinary citizens who cannot provide it for themselves” thereby proves that they are in fact neither of those things.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      I think things were very much structured like this in 1950s America. And some of the “virtuous elite” may have even taken seriously this supposed role of theirs. Some of them may have had the capacity to have at least some guilt for just being the parasitic and idle rich.

      However, the qons kept agitating and agitating to have lower and lower tax rates for the poor aggrieved extremely rich and so you see a stark rise in CEO compensation, huge wealth inequality spikes and a gigantic crash in union membership and government services…

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        You’re forgetting about the whole “segregation” period with those rose tinted glasses and ignoring that it was UNIONS that fought and bled for their standard of living, not the oligarchs.

        • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Oh, my comment was not intended to gloss over any problems of the marginalized in the 1950s or to credit the elite with unions; my point is that there may have been some elite that took the concept of being benevolent seriously; the rest worked to dismantle any benefits to the middle class for their own (further) benefit.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Where those the “Prominent Jews” who got Pontius Pilate to crucify Jesus? Seems I have been mixing them so I guess its time to crack open the good book again so I know what I’m denying. Anyone know where to get a copy thats not the KJV?