Summary

In an emotional monologue, John Oliver urged undecided and reluctant voters to support Kamala Harris, emphasizing her policies on Medicare, reproductive rights, and poverty reduction.

Addressing frustrations over the Biden administration’s Gaza policy, he acknowledged the struggle for many voters yet cited voices like Georgia State Rep. Ruwa Romman, who supports Harris despite reservations.

Oliver warned of the lasting consequences of a second Trump term, including potential Supreme Court shifts.

Oliver said voting for Harris would mean the world could laugh at this past week’s photo of an orange, gaping-mouthed Trump in a fluorescent vest and allow Americans to carry on with life without worrying about what he might do next.

      • eldavi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        47
        ·
        10 days ago

        there’s a meme from a protest sign floating around asking why it’s easier to accept that hundreds of millions of people lazy rather than accepting that it’s a few 100 people creating the problem.

        similarly, harris is one person and her changing her strategy will have a bigger impact than millions of people changing theirs to suit hers before the election and she doesn’t even have to mean it:

        she could literally just pay lip service the day of the election where it can do the least amount of damage when it comes to moderate voters and that would gain the support of people like me; but she won’t

        • takeda@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 days ago

          She has to take current strategy, because people like you are not voting, so in order to win she has to rely on votes of people that you don’t agree with.

          • eldavi@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            25
            ·
            10 days ago

            i live in a solidly blue state and voting third party. i couldn’t help trump win even if i wanted to because of the same electoral college that’s helping him win; i’m using the system against itself and you should too every single chance you get.

            • Stovetop@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              10 days ago

              You keep saying that, as if the people with more sense who live around you excuse your poor decisionmaking.

              I voted third-party out of protest in 2016, in a solidly blue state, and it was one of the dumbest things I’ve ever done. I’d love to convince you somehow to not repeat the same mistake I did, but I can’t say anything that others in this thread haven’t already, and you seem very unwilling to listen to any of it.

              • eldavi@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                edit-2
                10 days ago

                I’d love to convince you somehow to not repeat the same mistake I did, but I can’t say anything that others in this thread haven’t already, and you seem very unwilling to listen to any of it.

                you can convince me and people like bernie & obama have convinced me several times over the decades.

                present a new argument that’s divorced from american popular indoctrination or give a new perspective that doesn’t originate from american propaganda or; at a minimum; give a stronger argument than “trump is worse”.

                and i keep saying that because people keep coming up w the same arguments.

                • Stovetop@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  at a minimum; give a stronger argument than “trump is worse”.

                  Kamala has campaigned to protect the bodily autonomy of women and to protect gay marriage, which are very much at stake in this election.

                  That should be enough, if you’re sincere in only seeking an argument that isn’t just “Trump is worse.”

                  • eldavi@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 days ago

                    i think it would be enough if i were younger so that i didn’t have first hand experience living through the hiv/aids crisis; 10450; dadt & doma. we’ve had it worse before; we’ve literally been doing it for centuries; and we managed to not only survive but thrive enough to shift popular support despite the democrats and the republicans efforts.

                    also the fact there’s significant overlap between the people who created/supported those policies and the people who want us to vote for them now further detracts from this argument.

                    finally the democrats literally did nothing to protect abortion despite several opportunities when they controlled both houses and the presidency over the decades. they still chose to do nothing with it and their track record convinces me that they never will; the best case scenario is another toothless law like the respect for marriage act.

                    this is a propaganda originated argument like i was referring to in my previous comment and if you were sincerely reading my comments you would have seen it multiple times.

    • dragontamer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      That the far left vote is fickle and that it’s better to try to cater to Dick and Liz Chaney and hope for the solid neoconservative vote instead??

      Yeah, abstain from voting harder. Let’s see where that gets ya. If you want to pull the party left, the. Prove to the party that there is a left they can pull to.

      • JaymesRS@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Is accepting someone’s support with literally nothing in trade really “catering to” though?

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          I mean the “trade” is just the implicit alignment of platform, really. Kamala offers stances that are not entirely disagreeable to moderate Republicans who feel more alienated by the neofascist shift the GOP has taken now.

          I wish Kamala was further to the left in general, but I can’t confidently say she’d gain more leftist votes than she’d lose centrist votes.

      • eldavi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        34
        ·
        10 days ago

        i live in a solidly blue state and voting third party. doing so guarantees that i could never help trump thanks to the same electoral college that gives trump a chance at winning; i’m using the system against itself and you should too whenever you have the chance.

        also republicans take direct action to work around issues that prevent their base from winning and democrats would benefit by taking similar actions; but don’t since leftists platforms drive away campaign donors so it’s a self made rock and a hard place for democrats.

        • dragontamer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          10 days ago

          Oh, so are you pushing for a Senator or a Representative who can more seriously push the party left?

          • eldavi@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            20
            ·
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            i left the democrat fold after dadt & doma and the ensuing decades have proved to me that it was the right decision for my circumstances and i made it easy for myself by moving into a solidly blue state where my choices would be drowned out by the voting masses who generally align with my views most of the time.

            i will have to make decisions once the democrat’s conversion into diet republicans starts to effect their palatability in my state and i’ll have an answer to your question at that time.

            • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              10 days ago

              So you gave up on Democrats over a generation ago and expect them to try courting you as a potential voter now?

              Good luck with that.

              Edit: and both of the reasons you cite have since been overturned… by Democrats.

              • eldavi@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                edit-2
                10 days ago

                i became twice bitten; thrice shy when i let bernie fool me into thinking that democrats could change in 2016 & 2020, so i don’t think the democrats could ever successfully court me again; but they could court the millions of their most fervent base to help them win elections instead of driving them away while becoming diet republicans.