• pjwestin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The only reason Newsom has had any interest from the broader electorate is that he was outspoken in opposing Trump. The minute he enters the primary and starts spouting the same valueless, donor-approved, corporate drivel as Kamala, Jefferies, Schumer, etc., he’s going to flame out fast.

  • LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I wouldn’t vote for Gavin if he was the Democratic candidate. He is just as horrible as the other Democrats.

    We need true change and true leaders that will change the government to work for the working class instead of the wealthy.

  • falseWhite@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    “b… b… bUt alL tHe BiLliOnAiReS wILl rUn aWAy. TRiCkLe DoWn eCoNoMiCs, sOmeThIng, SoMeThIng” - bootlicking cunt

    Newsom has received campaign cash from billionaires such as Netflix co-founder Reed Hastings, philanthropist Laurene Powell Jobs, and former Google CEO Eric Schmidt, among others.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Gonna have to change that stance if he wants to run on the Dem ticket in the year of our lord 2028.

    Cuz everyone gonna be REAL fucking mad at billionaires by then if things keep going the way they are.

    • BanMe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I genuinely hope so, but at the same time, polling shows conservatives and moderates don’t currently hate billionaires - they think of them as smart job creators. We have to change their hearts and minds on this, they are hearing nothing but propaganda from the billionaires themselves, all of it blaming brown and black people for their woes.

      Killing multiple birds with one stone, we need to educate people on what’s actually happening instead of assuming they’ll just break down and join our side (which also applies to a number of other issues). We don’t have an education apparatus right now which is a huge miss. Education campaigns need to be running billboards and commercials explaining what we already know and take for granted.

  • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Jon Stewart, 2028.

    The problem with Reagan and Trump isn’t that they were actors. The problem is that they were complete pieces of shit long before they were elected.

    Actor-presidents have demonstrated a natural propensity for revolutionary disruption of entrenched attitudes. Reagan completely fucked over economic policy; Trump is completely fucking over the fundamental concept of democracy.

    Imagine that same degree of revolutionary disruption moving us toward egalitarianism rather than corpo-fascism.

    • witten@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Jon Stewart is no progressive, and some of his takes are frustratingly bad. Just this Monday, he made the case to his interviewee that there’s basically nothing we can do about climate change except maybe a little carbon scrubbing after the fact.

      • Batman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        He makes his position clear at 7:50 of that interview that he defers to climate scientists on the issue and continues to ask the writer “what can we do”? Which in my mind is all we can hope for in a politician.

        It seems your referencing his suggested response at 8:30. But he then works off her response, that there is no clear path forward, which is inline with his previously stated position frankly.

  • rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    115
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    And so it begins. Abandon all progressive ideas to appeal to the “centrist”, only to lose to the fascist again. I hate it here.

    • NeilBrü@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      His sales pitch is centered around “I’m not a Republicantm!”

      Most people on this planet don’t lose a second of sleep or shed one tear if the poor die, including the poor.

      On the assumption that we are able to vote at the time, if it’s between him and <insertAuthoritarianDouchebagHere>, I’ll vote for him.

      However, I’d imagine that most of my fellow U. S. Citizens are well aware that this sheister is not some sort of “friend” of the poor and the middle class.

      • ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I’d vote for him over Trump, but he has not won me over by any stretch, just like Harris, Biden, and (Hillary) Clinton.

        A fun PR person sending tweets is insufficient to win my vote. I wouldn’t be voting for him, I’d be voting against Trump, as has been the case each time Trump has been on the ballot.

  • 6stringringer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I mean c’mon, let’s not get too carried away, next thing ya know they’ll be wanting to tax the billionaires or something.

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    At this point in time I’m pretty sure you would win in a landslide if you ran on taxing billionaires. Is being greedy a requirement to be a politician in the US?

    • I_Jedi@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      19 hours ago

      If you’re not greedy, the billionaires won’t fund your campaign. Then you lose.

  • rhubarb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    20 hours ago

    At some point the left needs to realize that sitting out voting doesn’t work. Yes the candidate sucks from your political stance but they are better than the alternative and it gives a platform from which to push left. This has been the playbook of the right for decades and is why they have been so successful in shifting the Overton window. They vote in any circumstance even if the candidate isn’t as right leaning as they would prefer but to them at least it’s not a dem.

    Edit: to be clear I’m all for taxing billionaires and corporations far more.

      • rhubarb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        20 hours ago

        As a permanent resident who cannot vote but pays 6 figures in taxes. VOTE. Some of us aren’t so lucky

        • return2ozma@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I’ll never vote for Newsom. I’ve stated that on here before. He’s anti-trans and deep in corporate pockets. The Getty family owns him.

          • rhubarb@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            20 hours ago

            So you’re ok with Trump. Got it. How’s his stance on Trans people?

            • I_Jedi@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              19 hours ago

              Staunch third party voter reporting in. Voting for the big two feels like an obligation given to me by the powerful. Third party is vastly more exciting!

            • return2ozma@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              19 hours ago

              Here we go again… “If you don’t vote for Biden you support Trump!” … “If you don’t vote for Harris you support Trump!” … “If you don’t vote for X you support Trump!”

              • I_Jedi@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                19 hours ago

                I wonder how that works in solid color states. If you vote third party in a solid blue state, does that mean a vote for red? Or is it actually a vote for blue if you ask for a red voter’s opinion on the matter?

                Going off the theory that your vote is actually for the person a particular voter opposes, does that mean your protest vote is actually determined by the popular vote? For example, if you protest voted the 2024 election, does that mean you actually voted blue because red won the popular vote? Assuming that every color says the protest vote voted for their enemies.

      • AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Every vote is a push in one direction or the other in the US. You can vote to push right, you can vote to push left, or you can avoid voting and let the rest of us decide for you. But the last time a bunch of leftists weren’t thrilled with the options, the electorate voted to push right. From your valid gripes against Newsom, I’m gonna guess that was not what you wanted.

        Come election day, one of the two candidates is guaranteed to become president. You cannot stop that. I won’t try to say Newsom is ideal or even a good candidate. I’d love to see someone else run instead. But if you want an even more leftist candidate next time, the country has to show they’ll tolerate movement in that direction, and that means not electing another fucking Republican.

      • mcv@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Every action is a vote for something. It never hurts to consider the consequences.

        By all means push forward a better candidate than Newsom. And I hope you succeed. But if you don’t, and it turns out that in the end it’s going to be either Newsom or Vance (or even Trump), then who would you rather have?

  • VampirePenguin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    If Newsom wins the primary, I’m out. I’d rather fight fascism on the streets than play this stupid ass good cop, bad cop game for another round. Fuck you, Democrats. Learn.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      They’ve been doing this game for a while. (They, being establishment politics, Dems and Republicans working together)

      They push the needle further right, put up less and less progressive, human candidates, and hope more and more people either tune out of politics or say “I’m out.”

      The unwillingness for people to wait out the hard shit as long as it’s pushing the needle back the left has brought us to the point that we have to choose between demons and ghouls. We could have nipped this back when we were forced to choose between “boring and not-quite-progressive-enough” but there were vast numbers of people saying “I’m out” that far back, and I know for a fact most of ya’ll would love one of them “boring” presidents if it means we have institutions back.

      • Triasha@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 minutes ago

        Yep, Biden, frail as he was, would have been better than trump, Hillary would have been better than trump, Biden was better than trump in 2020, Kamala would have been better than trump. If American refused to elect a Republican there would be room for a debate between a leftist and a liberal.

  • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I’d vote for Newsom if he’s the nominee, but I really hope he’s not the nominee (assuming, obviously, the relative utopian future where we get to vote in 2028).

    I’m glad when his media exposure goals overlap with doing actual good things, but - and I may be putting too fine a point on it - he’s basically Hillary if Hillary had a penis and was super jazzed about it, and I am fairly confident I know the smug look he makes when he smells his own farts.

  • Doozer@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Liberals gonna liberal.

    I’d still rather have a capitalist than a fascist.

    • ynthrepic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      But milquetoast is losing. People want change. The time to start thinking about alternatives to him is now.

      I think AOC will have a better chance frankly. Particularly if Memdani’s momentum continues.

      • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        A lefty needs to win a governor seat in a major state first to continue that momentum to the White House. That will give the average blue voter the confidence to vote for a social democrat or socialist in the primaries.