• u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    408
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    He also had a three-page handwritten manifesto that included grievances with the US healthcare system, a document that spoke to the suspect’s “motivation and mindset”, officials said.

    Publish it then.

  • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    283
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 days ago

    Reported by a worker at McD. Wtf, they’re the group that would benefit the most from a change in the healthcare system. Idiot.

    • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      152
      arrow-down
      38
      ·
      17 days ago

      Reported by a worker at McD. Wtf, they’re the group that would benefit the most from a change in the healthcare system. Idiot.

      Or, and hear me out here, we can view this with a little sympathy: there’s $60k in rewards for anyone who turned this guy in, and the person who did it makes peanuts at McDonalds.

      Now, I don’t know if I would do it, but I can completely and utterly sympathize why someone who makes poverty wages would turn class traitor for what almost certainly life-changing money.

          • pivot_root@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            45
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            17 days ago

            With the review bombing and public hatred of that McDonald’s location? Fired is more like it.

              • pivot_root@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                23
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                17 days ago

                The corporation? Definitely not. But review bombing and boycotting will hurt the profits of that franchised location, and its owner certainly will.

            • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              17 days ago

              I meant more like, that’s the best accolade you may get as someone working for McDonald’s. But yes, McDonald’s absolutely has a reason to support the status quo in terms of corporate rule.

        • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          17 days ago

          They’ll let him order anything he wants off the dollar menu!

          Which is really just a pack of fries, minus the fries at this point, becaues what store has a dollar menu anymore?

        • DontMakeMoreBabies@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          No way the average person working at Mcdonalds does anything but blow 60k even if they get it.

          Edit: To be clear, I spent 4 years working at one. Good people, bad people, but not much economic sophistication in either group.

          • Bgugi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            15 days ago

            Yeah, the fucking idiot will probably all blow it on something stupid like an ER visit.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        57
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        17 days ago

        I don’t. Might as well just be a cop if you think like that, plenty of room for bootlicking morons in that profession.

        • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          Here here. I’m poor as shit, got no insurance whatsoever, 60k would be somewhat life changing for me. I would never ever squeal on a comrade like that, even for millions.

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        17 days ago

        that person might get 60k…

        maybe because of this circle jerk, regime will pay out to prove a point.

        but there is a lesson in this discussion folks.

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        16 days ago

        Neat how that works. Keep the populace poor and they become a wall to wall surveillance system for you. And people worry about technology…

        • FindME@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 days ago

          If I remember correctly, they can be anonymous. If that’s the case, they wouldn’t really be easily taxable. Still, we are talking about the government here, and if they tax lottery winnings, I would bet they tax rewards.

          • pivot_root@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            47
            ·
            17 days ago

            To be charitable, other people can have different views on ethics.

            For example, if harming a CEO who helped raise claim denial rates from less than 10% to 30% results in revised policies and less overall suffering, that could be morally justifable to some.

          • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            31
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            17 days ago

            Vigilante justice indicates a failure in the system to administer justice.

            It is absolutely in society’s interest that someone who has caused deaths and misery of thousands is punished.

              • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                17
                ·
                17 days ago

                Luigi wasn’t really in a position where he could stop the CEO through any lesser use of force.

                • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  18
                  ·
                  17 days ago

                  And that’s because it’s not his job to do so. Not every problem needs to be solvable by any given individual.

                  If he really was that passionate about the problem, he should’ve run for office to get into a position to solve the problem, or at least joined forces with some group that pushes for causes he believes in. Or started a business to compete with those businesses he disagrees with. Those would all be proactive steps he could take. Killing a CEO doesn’t solve anything, another will take his place, and surely he knew that.

          • cm0002@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            32
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            17 days ago

            What about the cheering on of murder in the street?

            Nah, that rich fuck had it coming, shooter is a hero.

          • Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            17 days ago

            We have a president who says that he could do exactly what The Adjuster did, and get away with it. If the president can do it, why not this guy?

            I don’t like it, but this is our world right now.

          • scarabic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            15 days ago

            I guess people are saying that they believe there is such a thing as an ethical murder in the streets. Of course in any form of ethics vacuum chamber this can’t stand. But in the real world where children are bombed for the sake of some asshole’s religion, where the president boasts he could get away with murder in the street and courts confirm this, in a world where sick people are left to suffer to boost a share price, then, THEN an act like this becomes a reasonable response to an unreasonable world.

            Maybe someone better educated can tell me what ethics scholars have to say about how an ethical actor should behave in a system where ethics have utterly broken down. Right now, the crowd is saying “like that guy.”

            I’m ill-disposed to wag my finger at them, and think the only ethical course is to address the corrupt environment in which this act occurred, because that environment undermines any one-dimensional ethical evaluation of this murder in the street, and that makes me deeply uncomfortable.

          • Nate Cox@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            17 days ago

            The comment I replied to wasn’t cheering on a murderer.

            The comment I replied to was trying to convey that an impoverished person may feel like the reward money for turning in a murderer outweighs any moralizing over the murder itself. That the dollar figure could be literally life changing and they may feel they have no option but to turn them in.

            And people downvoted that. Hence my shaken faith in people’s ability to empathize.

        • boonhet@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          17 days ago

          shooter and ceo were closer in class than the shooter and working class

          Ah, good ol’ “anyone who makes enough money to pay rent is part of the capitalist class, not the working class”

            • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              16 days ago

              He was a white collar working class guy. His work history is full of positions at various tech companies working as an engineer. It doesn’t appear that he was handed any sort of dynasty.

              He was upper class, and he had better opportunities than your average American, but he was still a worker.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          17 days ago

          Some people think anyone whose parents actually owned a house are “the elites”.

          No. The CEO earned more in a year than even someone with a six figure salary would earn in a lifetime.

            • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              16 days ago

              Maybe his family did, but judging by his work history, he wasn’t personally wealthy enough to be owning a country club.

              If he was “owns a country club” rich, his work history would mostly just say “Owner and CEO of whatever country club”.

              There’s no reason to work any sort of normal job if you have that kind of income rolling in.

            • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              16 days ago

              Could well be in debt up to their eyeballs and barely making a profit, for all we know.

    • squid_slime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      Simply a lack of class consciousness. America has worked hard since the rise of the USSR to topple workers power through union busting and destruction of community.

      Basically we are built by our material conditions.

    • maplebar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      One doesn’t have to go far to find a boot-licking class traitor who thinks if they run the rat race well enough they’ll get a piece of cheese.

      But to be fair to the McDonalds worker, the cash reward is designed to do just that.

    • FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      $50k is 1-2 years pay for the person who reported him. For them, that short term relief was worth more than the highly improbable outcome where this man’s actions actually impact their life in a positive way in the next few months. Money wins almost every time

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      Idiot yes but we can’t be too harsh on the pedon… so much education needs to be done, and these recent events is a good time for outreach and education.

      Unity is the message. Luigi did the hard work, least the plebs can do it show some solidarity.

        • Anti-Face Weapon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          17 days ago

          Tell that to the social Democrats that build labor rights brick by brick a century ago. A lot of times they litterally starved on strike.

          • thefartographer@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            17 days ago

            You’re right. But they would have literally starved or been mangled by a machine if they had done nothing. Back then, the greatest weapons the top 1% had were hired guns.

            A century ago, your choices were to die today on strike, or die tomorrow from starvation or work conditions, even if you play by the rules. Now, the greatest weapon the 1% has is complacency. You can die today on strike or you can play by the rules and the corporate overlords will feed you just enough until you become too expensive to feed.

            How do you ask someone to starve when they have a legitimate alternative? Complacency is a killer.

            • Telorand@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              17 days ago

              How do you ask someone to starve when they have a legitimate alternative?

              I know this was more of a rhetorical question, but for anyone who is legitimately asking this question: you show them that it’s not actually a binary choice. There’s options like communism and unionization that can both protect them and feed them.

              • thefartographer@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                17 days ago

                The best part of long-term solutions is that they’re actually solutions. The worst part about immediate satisfaction is that it’s only immediately satisfying. If someone has an immediate problem, it’s hard to get them to look at long-term solutions.

                Sorry, I’ve been a major downer today…

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          17 days ago

          in practice it do seem like that…

          But the Adjuster was from well off family, and not all of us dirt poor… i don’t blame the snitch here.

          I do expect most people to be able to do their part tho… if wage slaves can’t rally around this, we gonna have another generation of the fuckening.

          make no mistake, the owner class will punish us hard for this.

          • thefartographer@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            17 days ago

            I don’t blame the worker either. I don’t know their story, but if someone told me that I could either keep my mouth shut or feed and care for my family, I’d probably get chatty too. $60K isn’t enough to feed you for life, but it’s enough to get reliable transportation, clear a little debt, and buy a little time and cloth to interview for a job that pays better than McDonald’s.

            What I’m saying is that it’s really hard to live by high standards when getting fired from your shitty-ass job could destroy, yet it doesn’t pay enough for you to escape. Once again, class solidarity is for those who can afford it.

            • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              17 days ago

              Once again, class solidarity is for those who can afford it.

              Ok, where are you going with this?

              middle 60% of america can’t afford to not be a bootlicker?

              • thefartographer@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                17 days ago

                The middle class income ranges from $17k per person up to $90k per person. I hope you don’t think that I’m trying to belittle anyone. Someone making 90K can definitely afford to not be a bootlicker; a family of four averaging nearly $17K per family member is gonna have a much harder time.

                The year that I lost my shit-paying job only to find an even worse-paying job with more hours was really fucking tough. If you’d offered me $60K legally when I was making $12K and scrambling for rent, I’d’ve had a really hard fucking time saying no to that. Back then, I was living alone and had very little to live for. Drop me into my current living arrangement and sub that situation: I’m saying yes to the money 80% of the time.

                I wish I could say that I’m better than that, but struggling in a capitalist society makes you sick, scared, and desperate really fast. I’m not saying that people with lower income deserve lower expectations or should live by lower standards. I’m just saying to reserve your judgement before shitting on someone and labeling them a snitch before you know whether they could have afforded anything else.

                For those of us who can afford class solidarity against the top 1%, we need to remember that the most vulnerable need to be helped up, not stepped on. Instinctually blaming this McDonald’s worker helps the billionaires class far more than many of us may realize.

                Maybe I’m off-base, but ultimately, this act of betrayal is unlikely to have an effect on the momentum of this potential movement. Whoever killed Thompson is unlikely to act again, their message was unlikely to be heard while they were in hiding, and if they are the hero everyone believes they also likely would forgive someone who was trying to de-shittify their life a little bit.

                If you want this to move forward, pull those below you up so they can join us, not attack them for being on a lower level. Class solidarity is for those who can afford it. It sounds like you and I can afford it, so help someone else be able to afford it. Don’t shun people who are too scared of starving to fight. Feed them.

    • Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      We can’t tell you who squealed, but it was one of the dozen employees at this McDonald’s. Probably the one that’s going to change jobs soon…

      I’d be pissed and scared if I was an employee at that McDonald’s

    • renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 days ago

      America’s working class has a long history of buying into propaganda and acting against their own interests. It’s a huge reason why the medical industry has gotten so bad.

      That being said, it’s important to keep our anger focused on the system, not people who are getting suckered by it.

      • sean@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        15 days ago

        It pains me to see so many people ready and willing to beat up their Trump voting neighbor who fell for propaganda designed for them but not the Trump financing ceos

    • rasakaf679@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      17 days ago

      Because they rely on “tips” , as the corporation is unable to pay a wage that is sufficient to support a basic standard of living. If only capitalist weren’t so greedy they wouldn’t be relying on the tips to survive.

        • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          16 days ago

          Also worked there. There is no McDonald’s that has ever allowed tips. It’s against their corporate rules. I even saw an employee get written up for accepting a tip, once.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      16 days ago

      Some of us aren’t brainwashed into bloodlust by marxist bullshit, even though we’re poor.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 days ago

        And here’s your 12 jury members…

        Oh, it’s Mark Cuban, Mark Zuckerburg, Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk, Bill Gates, Rupert Murdoch,

        …I could keep this joke going if I used google, but is it sad that I could name 6 people by memory just by using the parameters “Rich asshole who would have no empathy for the general public, and would absolutely convict”?

        • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          17 days ago

          it would have to be 12 CEOs but they deff aint got to be proper owner oligarch… just scrape some middling f500 roaster with some “nonames”

          but yes valid point… but defense can generally strike some of these.

          this guy going to need proper counsel, I am assuming fun raising won’t be an issue. he deserves the best.

          coupled with proper PR campaign on socials since TV will try to destroy him.

          this jury must not convict because the glove don’t fit hehe

          • Norin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            17 days ago

            Plenty of lawyers, at least some of them talented, will offer to defend him for free.

            It could make their career.

            • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              17 days ago

              defense of this scale will require several million dollars, nobody will do that for free.

              also, defending this guy will make you enemy of the owner class. top talent will opt out.

            • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              16 days ago

              I am not going to watch 70 minutes movie, but according to brief skimming through the discussion it’s about business practice of the Microsoft from times of windows 3.11

              I am talking about his today’s undeniable philantropic work and the fact is he is really far from the rest of the people on your list.

              People are allowed to evolve and if every billionaire in the world would evolve I’m the same direction he did, world would be better place.

              • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                16 days ago

                It’s a podcast and you can listen while doing other things. 70 minutes isn’t very long.

                You can deny his recent philanthropic work because his libertarian mentality corrupts it. He helped fund covid 19 vaccine research, but also demanded that the patents not be released, so profit could be made. This is in direct contrast to the lead scientist of the poli vaccine opening it up for anyone to make, comparing the ownership of a vaccine to trying to own sunlight.

                While there’s evidence that Gates did not participate in Epstein’s parties, he did know about and choose to stay silent.

                Gates is a full blown elite larping as a humanitarian when the role of his foundation should be occupied by a tax funded gov org.

        • NewNewAccount@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          I mean… it does seem pretty fair? If the jury is hung it’s up to the state to retry. If the jury comes back not guilty then that’s the end of it.

      • TheFogan@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        17 days ago

        Fortunately in criminal trials if the Jury can return a not guilty verdict, that’s game over for the states case. Double jeopardy they can’t retry.

        Now if one guy on the Jury opposes a guilty verdict, and no verdict is reached, then the state can retry.

        • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          They could also go after him with Thompson’s family in civil suit to destroy him financially, which it turns out is not double jeopardy

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        70
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        I like that, but there is a major problem with it, and it’s around 2:49 in the video:

        Do you have any beliefs that might prevent you from making a decision based strictly on the law?

        Grey suggests that saying “No” with intent to nullify is lying, and therefore perjury. He is wrong. Where legislated law and constitutional law come into conflict (and they do in all cases of nullification), it is your duty to strictly follow constitutional law. You must judge the case as a layperson. You are constitutionally obligated to follow your own sense of rationality. That means if legislated law provides an undesirable outcome, you are obligated to “strictly follow [constitutional] law”, and refuse to convict under a lower law.

        I can honestly claim to have no beliefs that would prevent me from making a decision based strictly on the law. The 6th Amendment is part of the law, and the 6th amendment requires and empowers me (as a juror) to make whatever decision I determine is appropriate.

          • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            21
            ·
            edit-2
            17 days ago

            We aren’t talking about the decision. We are talking about voir dire. You certainly can be charged and convicted of perjury if you lie during voir dire.

            But again: it is not a lie to remember that the 6th Amendment right to a trial by jury of peers (as opposed to professional jurists) is constitutional law. It supersedes any legislated law, or any directive provided by any court. I hold no beliefs that might prevent me from making a decision strictly in accordance with the law.

            • AtariDump@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              17 days ago

              We are talking about voir dire.

              Wait, that isn’t just a term from “My Cousin Vinny”‽

          • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            66
            ·
            17 days ago

            And they would respond “You are excused, with our thanks”.

            Don’t get creative. The only correct answer is “no”.

            • antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              17 days ago

              I had half a day to think about it when they were selecting jury for a DUI case. I’d rather speak my mind freely for the jurors they’ve already selected, who are present during the full selection process. Normally one might think context doesn’t matter but DUI laws can also apply to a bicycle, which is a perfect candidate for being nullified by the jury.

    • turtle [he/him]@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      Careful, in case you haven’t heard, discussing jury nullification is apparently against the rules of lemmy.world. SMH (at lemmy.world admins).

      • zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        The pinned post on lemmy.world right now clarifies that discussing jury nullification for crimes that have already happened, such as this, is perfectly acceptable. It’s only discussing it with respect to crimes which have not yet been committed which is against the TOS.

        • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          Wait, we got a Future Crimes Division? I didn’t know .world was run by a bunch of milky precogs…

          • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            17 days ago

            If you plan some violence and include jury nullification as some viable part of the plan, and publish that shit online, not only is it kind of useless and lousy opsec, but it will attract heat that is unwanted and unnecessary. It’s literally a conspiracy to undermine nullification at that point, like a false flag. So no, don’t do that, and I back the mods on this.

        • turtle [he/him]@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          If you trust them after having enforced an unwritten policy and still not allowing discussion of something that’s perfectly legal.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        I’m not sure that’s true. I’ve had plenty of comments stay up. My guess is either the mod team got their shit together or those comments were deleted for other reasons.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        They are certainly empowered to do that, just as I am empowered to block any instance I don’t want to participate in. If they are not tolerant and respectful of my beliefs (even if they don’t share them) then I don’t want to contribute to their community either.

        Layperson juries are a fundamental component of criminal justice. The law exists to serve the people, not the lawyers, not the government. Rejecting jurors for understanding the purpose of having a layperson jury fundamentally violates the rights of the accused in particular, and society in general.

  • underwire212@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    129
    arrow-down
    42
    ·
    17 days ago

    There’s a picture of him holding a McD happy meal?? He had the gun and manifesto just laying there in his backpack? You f’ing kidding??

    Some elite fucks used an advanced AI search algorithm to search a bunch of people who vaguely looked like him. Input term search for social media and ‘reviews’ to further narrow down until you find someone who has a few tweets and posts that the media can point to say “yup hey look, he liked Kzynski’s manifesto on goodreads…got the guy!”. Plant evidence, and you got your scapegoat.

    This poor kids’ life is ruined. And he will probably be threatened if he doesn’t plead guilty and waive jury trial. He’ll get a visit from the MIB threatening to skin his family alive in front of him if he doesn’t play along.

    • workerONE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      114
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      Reading these fantasy takes is exhausting. It’s hard to want to be a part of a community that supports this guy by gaslighting everyone, saying things like “it’s not the same guy in the four photos!” Just hundreds of people all convinced they can secure this guys freedom by acting dumb and face blind- you’ve created a whole fictional scenario here that’s just unbelievable and unrealistic.

      If he didn’t want to get caught he shouldn’t have left DNA all over, shouldn’t have taken off his mask, shouldn’t be carrying the murder weapon days later… He could have helped himself but instead there’s an army of idiots who are probably just creating this fan fiction to impress their peers. It’s very childish though. This guy tried to do something which is commendable, or maybe he’s just mentally ill, but I’m just tired of reading all this nonsense. Who are you signalling to?

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        66
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        I posted this elsewhere, but this is one of the few times I buy the conspiracy theory, not the official story.

        Dude pulls off a targeted assassination, gets away clean, trolls the cops with a bag of monopoly money, gets out of the state, stays essentially hidden for almost a week… And then gets clocked by some poor maccas employee and gets taken in with a manifesto AND a gun on his person?

        It’s the nazi flag and 3 copies of The Sims all over again, except this time the folks doing it are slightly more competent and actually pulled it off.

        This case is so important, so high profile, that they just need to arrest someone ASAP. Anyone. And that person is not in for a good time.

        • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          17 days ago

          There’s a simple explanation: He wanted to keep on the move, and he wanted to be able to take down other targets.

        • fluxion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          17 days ago

          His face jas been plastered everywhere for the past week. My YouTube home page literally had 3-4 thumbnails of his face on every reload. Lemmy…X…news sites…massive exposure.

          So yah…some random worker notices his face looks kind of similar while he’s dining at his favorite spot and bam. Don’t forget there was a $10k bounty, plenty of fast food workers might be itching to collect on something like that.

          He probably figured once he was questioned about anything that they’d eventually get him so he prepared for that scenario. Or maybe this wasn’t even his last stop on his triple-D tour so he was still geared up.

          We’ll see him in court. If he’s innocent then he make a pretty good argument and then we can decide whether to raise eyebrows but this all just seems Q-anon levels of silly right now.

            • Defaced@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              15 days ago

              $50k from the FBI?! You gotta be shitting me… If this happened to anyone of us the FBI wouldn’t give a single fuck.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        50
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        To be fair, people were posting actors who look like the very shitty pictures we have of the guy too, and I buy some of them. Honestly, the picture we have looks more like Timothée Chalamet than this guy. I’m not saying it isn’t this guy, or it is Chalamet, but there’s a shit ton of people in this world, and a lot look like the shooter.

        Edit to add: I’ll never trust the word of the authorities. They have to prove that this is the man. It’s their duty, not ours.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          17 days ago

          If you look at a photo of the guy taken from above him, so a similar angle to the surveillance camera, he looks very similar. I do think it’s him.

        • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          23
          ·
          17 days ago

          If you will not trust authorities how do you expect them to prove it to you?

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            32
            ·
            17 days ago

            They’re going to have to take it to court and provide evidence. Trust is what you give to someone without the need for evidence. If they can prove it, then sure I’ll believe it. I’m not just going to trust that they’re correct without that though.

            • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              17 days ago

              Is there a reason to think there will be no trial and this guy by some reason will end up in some CIA black site without trial?

              I just find it interesting that someone who has absolutely no trust in authorities does not have a theory that court can be influenced by the same authorities.

              • rumba@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                16 days ago

                end up in some CIA black site without trial?

                No, he’d end up Epsteined. If the evidence were a plant, he’d be of no use to them alive.

          • Dupree878@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            16 days ago

            Even if they proved it was him it doesn’t matter. When OJ was acquitted, Jurors admitted they did it as a fuck you to the LAPD and justice system.

        • nomous@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          17 days ago

          unless you’ve worked in my field, which I can say with near certainty you haven’t, then you haven’t seen, witnessed, or experienced the things I have

          I’ll bite, what field are you in?

    • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      17 days ago

      I think he knew he was going to get caught. Words on bullets, monopoly money… It’s trying to make the story larger and larger. Pretty sure he will make a show in front of the jury.

      I don’t know if that will work, but I respect that more than he killed the pig without making clear why.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      17 days ago

      You can’t convince me this is the real shooter, this guy looks more like Skeet from Jimmy Neutron than the “Grin Reaper” in the now famous pic

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        17 days ago

        I said this to many folks IRL, the guy the NYPD charges will not be the shooter. just some poor sap that gets sent to prison for life because he had a dissenting opinion.

        it’s the high price we pay to keep them in power.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      17 days ago

      What would “the elites” stand to gain from framing this dude, while the actual killer is still on the loose?

      This is pretty unhinged, to be honest.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          By sending him to prison?

          That’s not really telling people anything they didn’t already know.

      • Bruncvik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        17 days ago

        The killer is not as dangerous as the approval for his act. The government wants to prevent copycat vigilantes by making an example out of him. Regardless whether this guy is guilty or not, they’ll drag him through the deepest mud and then string him up with the harshest possible sentence, to discourage others from gunning down CEOs.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          I very much doubt the possibility of going to prison will deter someone pissed off enough to kill someone.

      • A Phlaming Phoenix@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        17 days ago

        I’m not adopting the conspiracy here, but if they can’t find the shooter with the whole country getting behind him, then they would want the optics of finding the shooter. Which could backfire, of course. It would be very telling, for example, if the cops got real confident about it and then the real shooter made some kind of public display with the false shooter in custody.

        • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          This was my thought process, too. If they got a framed guy here, the actual CEO killer would likely or hopefully do something else to let the public know that they were still out there.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          16 days ago

          Yeah, thats part of the reason I don’t buy it. If the actual killer acts again, it will be very embarrassing for the police.

      • underwire212@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        Yeah, I get that. However, the optics of having a successful “martyr” symbol is very, very dangerous. A wide scope of narrative means difficult to control. Difficult to control introduces “motivator to action” symbols among a, I think, specific (and quite populous) demographic (think of all the young males with zero purpose, waiting to seize on an opportunity for a real life Mr Robot, for example)… “well if he could do it, get away with it, AND become a ’hero’, what’s stopping me from doing the same?”

        Having someone, anyone, buys time to craft the narrative and gauge public sentiment and, most importantly, dampen the probability of a revolutionary ’spark’ if you will.

        Obviously we don’t have enough information here. It very well could be the dude they have in custody. I am only sharing one possible theory based off my experience and observations. And there are a number of very suspect observations here that are in line with narrative management.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          I think the actual truth is, this guy isn’t a criminal mastermind, and he got caught.

          He also looks a lot like the surveillance photo.

        • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          17 days ago

          He was an ivy league grad, vacations in Bali, and his family owns a country club and a chain of nursing homes. He almost certainly has more money than the guy he shot.

          • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            16 days ago

            No way that he personally had more money than the CEO, from just looking at his work history. Maybe his whole family has more money than the CEO, but if we compared whole families against each other, the CEOs family would still come out on top.

            • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              16 days ago

              He was CEO, not founder. The dude was only worth around $50 million. The shooters family owns a country club and an entire chain of nursing homes. They almost certainly have more money, probably a lot more money.

              I can’t answer your other questions. Perhaps the answers will be in his manifesto.

  • Mikina@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 days ago

    I admit I’m kinda disappointed. He pulled out almost perfect assassination that looked well thought out, managed to get away with only a few hickups in his plan as far as his face is considered, and then walks around with a murder weapon and a manifesto in his bag? Shame, really. All he needed was to lay low for a while, grow a beard and he’d probably be OK.

    • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      17 days ago

      Check out parallel construction concept…

      He didn’t… They found where he dispose of it and gave to police to plant on him so we have to accept he is the perp…

      You can get creative with who “they” are here btw

      BC if you got murdered they would never do this.

      Also he left a dead man switch for YouTube upload.

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      17 days ago

      Maybe plotting how to dispose of it, perhaps extra paranoid with how much he blew up. Unfortunately all the memes of him probably helped spread the search for him. Not everyone who saw a meme agreed with his actions.

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 days ago

        It was a ghost gun, he could have thrown it into any ditch and not have it traced back to him.

        • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          17 days ago

          He’d probably be ditching more than just that. He could be caught on a security camera disposing of it which could give further clues. He may also had no intention of disposal and intended to keep the firearm.

          • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            17 days ago

            There are not security cameras all the way.

            He may also had no intention of disposal

            The whole point of a ghost gun is to be able to throw it away and have it not traced back to you.

            • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              17 days ago

              Private security footage could have caught him disposing, someone could have witnessess and grabbed another photo of him using his their cell phone. He could be worried about finger prints on the gun or other biological clues. And if a ghost gun is so untraceable, keeping it after a crime shouldn’t be proof, because how do you prove it was this ghost gun used in the crime? He could claim he just keeps it for self defense or was interested in how far 3D printed tech has come

              He could be planning another assassination or desire to keep the weapon for self defense purposes. I think you are downplaying the parannoia that would come with such a large scale manhunt accompanied with becoming an internet meme spreading your photo and awareness of your act over night. Paranoia makes you constantly think “but what if?” And that paranoia is even stronger in an extreme circumstance like this.

              The fact is, we may never know why he kept it.

              • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                16 days ago

                Even without serial number, a ghost gun will leave rifling marks on the bullets which can be compared by firing the gun into ballistic gel

    • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      In other threads, people have suggested that he might be carrying the manifesto in case he was shot and killed if/when arrested.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 days ago

    I love how transparent the billionaire media is now. everything I’ve heard about this guy is a character assassination or speculative at best.

    they even mobbed the highschool he graduated from…EIGHT YEARS AGO. All to get some clips they can piece together to fit the narrative that he’s “a bad crazy man with a gun”.

    this shooting has certainly scared the fucking shit out of the aristocracy though. you can tell how scared they are by how hard the media is pushing the story of his capture.

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 days ago

    You know, is said he worked UI at Firaxia from '15 to '17, which first made me think he worked on Civ VI, but then more likely Xcom Chimera Squad?

    You don’t get that job without having some interest in games. I hope it turns out he actually played Assassin’s Creed and is intentionally pulling an Ezio look, smile and all.